Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb/Mar;41(2):128-133.
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000739.

Is It Correct to Correct for Prematurity? Theoretic Analysis of the Bayley-4 Normative Data

Glen P Aylward  1
Affiliations

Is It Correct to Correct for Prematurity? Theoretic Analysis of the Bayley-4 Normative Data

Glen P Aylward. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2020 Feb/Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether correction for prematurity is appropriate for cognitive, language, and motor function at varying degrees of prematurity and at different baseline functional levels.

Methods: The newly published Bayley-4 normative data on 1700 normal children were used. Raw scores for baseline levels of function (-2 SD, -1 SD, and M) were identified at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months for receptive communication, expressive communication, fine motor, and gross motor scaled scores and cognitive, language, and motor composite scores. Differences between the baseline and uncorrected scores at 4, 3, 2, and 1 months of prematurity were evaluated at each age.

Results: Using a cutoff of 3 points (1/5 SD), correction is needed for cognitive composite scores at all gestational ages for the first 2 years and in those born 4 months premature at 3 years of age; language and motor composite scores should be corrected to 3 years at all degrees of prematurity.

Conclusion: Not correcting for prematurity in cognitive, language, and motor function at 3 years and younger places preterm infants at a distinct disadvantage when compared to peers with few exceptions, suggesting that such correction should be routine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. D'Augustino JA. An evidentiary review regarding the use of chrolonogical and adjusted age in the assessment of preterm infants. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2010;15:26–32.
    1. Wilson SL, Cradock MM. Review: accounting for prematurity in developmental assessment and the use of age-adjusted scores. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29:641–649.
    1. Elliman AM, Bryan EM, Elliman AD, et al. Gestational age correction for height in preterm children to seven years of age. Acta Paediatr. 1992;81:836–839.
    1. Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Do we need to correct age for prematurity when assessing children? J Pediatr. 2016;173:11–12.
    1. Belcher HM, Gittlesohn A, Capute AJ, et al. Using the clinical linguistic and auditory milestone scale for developmental screening in high-risk preterm infants.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997;36:635–642.