Reply: The Difference between Trends and Standards on Gluteal Aesthetics: The Impact of Social Media on Beauty Preferences
- PMID: 31568333
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006039
Reply: The Difference between Trends and Standards on Gluteal Aesthetics: The Impact of Social Media on Beauty Preferences
Comment on
-
Augmentation Gluteoplasty: A Brazilian Perspective.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct;142(4):910-919. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004809. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 29979370
-
Augmentation Gluteoplasty: A Brazilian Perspective.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Oct;144(4):711e-712e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006038. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31568332 No abstract available.
References
-
- Rosique RG, Rosique MJF. Augmentation gluteoplasty: A Brazilian perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:910–919.
-
- Singh D. Universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clin Plast Surg. 2006;33:359–370.
-
- Oranges CM, Schaefer KM, Gohritz A, Haug M, Schaefer DJ. The mirror effect on social media self-perceived beauty and its implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4:e1088.
-
- Wong WW, Motakef S, Lin Y, Gupta SC. Redefining the ideal buttocks: A population analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1739–1747.
-
- Heidekrueger PI, Sinno S, Tanna N, et al. The ideal buttock size: A sociodemographic morphometric evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:20e–32e.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
