Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jan;148(1):59-64.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12988. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Firouzeh Ghaffari et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist microdose flare-up and GnRH agonist flare-up protocols among women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

Methods: Randomized controlled trial study among 131 women with poor ovarian reserve who underwent ICSI cycles at a single center in Tehran, Iran, between September 2008 and May 2014. Eligible women were randomly assigned to either the microdose flare-up (n=66) or flare-up (n=65) protocol. The primary outcome measure was live birth rate.

Results: Both groups were comparable in cycle cancellation, mean number of dominant follicles, retrieved oocytes, and metaphase II oocytes. Number of stimulation days (P=032) and endometrial thickness (P=0.001) were significantly higher, and gonadotropin dose was non-significantly higher (P=0.075) in the microdose flare-up group than in the flare-up group. No difference in clinical pregnancy, implantation, or abortion rate was observed between the two protocols. Live birth was higher in the microdose flare-up group than in the flare-up group (P=0.036).

Conclusion: The microdose flare-up protocol seemed to be superior to the flare-up protocol, but it required a higher dose of gonadotropins and a longer duration of stimulation. Further prospective clinical trials of the microdose flare-up protocol are recommended. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01006954.

Keywords: Embryo transfer; GnRH agonist flare-up; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone; Infertility; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Microdose GnRH agonist flare-up; Poor ovarian response; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, et al. Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:235-246.
    1. Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Bontis J, Tarlatzis BC. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:749-766.
    1. Kahraman K, Berker B, Atabekoglu CS, et al. Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2437-2444.
    1. Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB. Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:667-676.
    1. Patrizio P, Vaiarelli A, Levi Setti PE, et al. How to define, diagnose and treat poor responders? Responses from a worldwide survey of IVF clinics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30:581-592.

Publication types

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources