Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
- PMID: 31569274
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12988
Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist microdose flare-up versus flare-up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist microdose flare-up and GnRH agonist flare-up protocols among women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.
Methods: Randomized controlled trial study among 131 women with poor ovarian reserve who underwent ICSI cycles at a single center in Tehran, Iran, between September 2008 and May 2014. Eligible women were randomly assigned to either the microdose flare-up (n=66) or flare-up (n=65) protocol. The primary outcome measure was live birth rate.
Results: Both groups were comparable in cycle cancellation, mean number of dominant follicles, retrieved oocytes, and metaphase II oocytes. Number of stimulation days (P=032) and endometrial thickness (P=0.001) were significantly higher, and gonadotropin dose was non-significantly higher (P=0.075) in the microdose flare-up group than in the flare-up group. No difference in clinical pregnancy, implantation, or abortion rate was observed between the two protocols. Live birth was higher in the microdose flare-up group than in the flare-up group (P=0.036).
Conclusion: The microdose flare-up protocol seemed to be superior to the flare-up protocol, but it required a higher dose of gonadotropins and a longer duration of stimulation. Further prospective clinical trials of the microdose flare-up protocol are recommended. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01006954.
Keywords: Embryo transfer; GnRH agonist flare-up; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone; Infertility; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Microdose GnRH agonist flare-up; Poor ovarian response; Randomized controlled trial.
© 2019 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, et al. Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:235-246.
-
- Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Bontis J, Tarlatzis BC. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:749-766.
-
- Kahraman K, Berker B, Atabekoglu CS, et al. Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2437-2444.
-
- Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB. Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:667-676.
-
- Patrizio P, Vaiarelli A, Levi Setti PE, et al. How to define, diagnose and treat poor responders? Responses from a worldwide survey of IVF clinics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30:581-592.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
