Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 29;20(19):4839.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20194839.

Perioperative Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Affiliations
Review

Perioperative Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Youn Joung Cho et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Remote ischemic conditioning has been investigated for cardioprotection to attenuate myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge of the signal transduction pathways of remote ischemic conditioning according to three stages: Remote stimulus from source organ; protective signal transfer through neuronal and humoral factors; and target organ response, including myocardial response and coronary vascular response. The neuronal and humoral factors interact on three levels, including stimulus, systemic, and target levels. Subsequently, we reviewed the clinical studies evaluating the cardioprotective effect of remote ischemic conditioning. While clinical studies of percutaneous coronary intervention showed relatively consistent protective effects, the majority of multicenter studies of cardiac surgery reported neutral results although there have been several promising initial trials. Failure to translate the protective effects of remote ischemic conditioning into cardiac surgery may be due to the multifactorial etiology of myocardial injury, potential confounding factors of patient age, comorbidities including diabetes, concomitant medications, and the coadministered cardioprotective general anesthetic agents. Given the complexity of signal transfer pathways and confounding factors, further studies should evaluate the multitarget strategies with optimal measures of composite outcomes.

Keywords: cardiac surgery; cardioprotection; diabetes; humoral pathway; neuronal pathway; propofol; remote ischemic conditioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Ibanez B., Heusch G., Ovize M., Van de Werf F. Evolving therapies for myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015;65:1454–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heusch G. Molecular basis of cardioprotection: Signal transduction in ischemic pre-, post-, and remote conditioning. Circ. Res. 2015;116:674–699. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305348. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Przyklenk K., Bauer B., Ovize M., Kloner R.A., Whittaker P. Regional ischemic ‘preconditioning’ protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation. 1993;87:893–899. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.87.3.893. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hausenloy D.J., Mwamure P.K., Venugopal V., Harris J., Barnard M., Grundy E., Ashley E., Vichare S., Di Salvo C., Kolvekar S., et al. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:575–579. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61296-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thielmann M., Kottenberg E., Kleinbongard P., Wendt D., Gedik N., Pasa S., Price V., Tsagakis K., Neuhauser M., Peters J., et al. Cardioprotective and prognostic effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A single-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:597–604. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61450-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources