Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 1;32(4):280-285.
doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.280.

The effect of needle tip position on the analgesic efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain: a retrospective observational study

Affiliations

The effect of needle tip position on the analgesic efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain: a retrospective observational study

Won-Joong Kim et al. Korean J Pain. .

Abstract

Background: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a treatment modality that alleviates radicular pain by intermittently applying high-frequency currents adjacent to the dorsal root ganglion. There has been no comparative study on analgesic effect according to the position of the needle tip in PRF treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PRF according to the needle tip position.

Methods: Patients were classified into 2 groups (group IP [group inside of pedicle] and group OP [group outside of pedicle]) based on needle tip position in the anteroposterior view of fluoroscopy. In the anteroposterior view, the needle tip was advanced medially further than the lateral aspect of the corresponding pedicle in group IP; however, in group OP, the needle tip was not advanced. The treatment outcomes and pain scores were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after applying PRF.

Results: At 4, 8, and 12 weeks, there were no significant differences between the successful response rate and numerical rating scale score ratio.

Conclusions: The analgesic efficacy of PRF treatment did not differ with the needle tip position.

Keywords: Analgesics; Ganglia, Spinal; Low Back Pain; Lumbosacral Region; Needles; Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment; Radiculopathy; Spinal Nerve Roots.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Determination of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) position. A and B are lines connecting the medial and lateral borders of the pedicles, respectively. If the midpoint of the DRG lies proximal to A, it is intraspinal type. If it is between A and B, it is foraminal type. If it is distal to B, it is extraforaminal type.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Position of the needle tip. (A) The needle tip was advanced medially further than the lateral aspect of the corresponding pedicle. (B) The needle tip was in the lateral aspect of the corresponding pedicle. P: pedicle.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow diagram of the patient inclusion process. MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, PRF: pulsed radiofrequency, DRG: dorsal root ganglion, Group IP: group inside of pedicle, Group OP: group outside of pedicle.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Numerical rating scale (NRS). Group IP: group inside of pedicle, Group OP: group outside of pedicle. *P < 0.05 relative to baseline.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abejón D, Garcia-del-Valle S, Fuentes ML, Gómez-Arnau JI, Reig E, van Zundert J. Pulsed radiofrequency in lumbar radicular pain: clinical effects in various etiological groups. Pain Pract. 2007;7:21–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00105.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Munglani R. The longer term effect of pulsed radiofrequency for neuropathic pain. Pain. 1999;80:437–9. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00183-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sluijter ME, Teixeira A, Van Duijn B. Comment on: Erdine S et al.; ultrastructural changes in axons following exposure to pulsed radiofrequency fields. Pain Pract. 2010;10:262. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00387_1.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi S, Yoshizawa H, Yamada S. Pathology of lumbar nerve root compression. part 2: morphological and immunohistochemical changes of dorsal root ganglion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:180–8. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00132-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugawara O, Atsuta Y, Iwahara T, Muramoto T, Watakabe M, Takemitsu Y. The effects of mechanical compression and hypoxia on nerve root and dorsal root ganglia. an analysis of ectopic firing using an in vitro model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:2089–94. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199609150-00006. - DOI - PubMed