Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Nov;28(6):e13164.
doi: 10.1111/ecc.13164. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

Patient preference for oral chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast and lung cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patient preference for oral chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast and lung cancer

Eva María Ciruelos et al. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Although new therapies against metastatic cancer have been developed in recent decades, chemotherapy is still an important treatment option. Prolonged treatment and side-effects are often discouraging for patients, and in many cases, therapy is only palliative, not curative. This study explores patient preference for oral or intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast or lung cancer.

Methods: It is a descriptive, open label, multicentre, nation-wide study, in which a 16-item questionnaire consisting of single-choice questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale was administered to patients in a single visit, and another 11-item questionnaire was self-administered by the patient's oncologist.

Results: A total of 131 breast and lung cancer specialists at 64 hospitals enrolled 412 patients (lung cancer = 161; breast cancer = 251). To be eligible, patients must have already received IV therapy and at least 2 cycles of oral chemotherapy. Most (77%) patients expressed preference for oral therapy. Most considered their daily life was less disrupted with tablets (70.4%), had no trouble swallowing them (86.9%), and were not concerned about forgetting to take them (56.8%). Half (56.3%) were worried about problems related to drug infusion with IV therapy, 61.7% were concerned about nurses failing to find a suitable vein, and 63.1% were dissatisfied with hospital waiting times. A uniform response was obtained from both samples of patients.

Conclusion: Convenience, ease of administration, fewer side effects and better quality of life tilt the balance towards oral drug administration.

Keywords: intravenous administration; metastasis; oral administration; patient preference; quality of life; tablets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aisner, J. (2007). Overview of the changing paradigm in cancer treatment: Oral chemotherapy. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 64, S4-S7. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070035
    1. Bartel, S. B. (2007). Safe practices and financial considerations in using oral chemotherapeutic agents. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 64, S8-S14. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070036
    1. Benjamin, L., Cotté, F. E., Philippe, C., Mercier, F., Bachelot, T., & Vidal-Trécan, G. (2012). Physicians' preferences for prescribing oral and intravenous anticancer drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment. European Journal of Cancer, 48, 912-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.019
    1. Borner, M., Scheithauer, W., Twelves, C., Maroun, J., & Wilke, H. (2001). Answering patients' needs: Oral alternatives to intravenous therapy. The Oncologist, 6(Suppl 4), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.6-suppl_4-12
    1. Depierre, A., Freyer, G., Jassem, J., Orfeuvre, H., Ramlau, R., Lemarie, E., … Trillet-Lenoir, V. (2001). Oral vinorelbine: Feasibility and safety profile. Annals of Oncology, 12, 1677-1681. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013567022670

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources