Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar-Apr;12(2):107-110.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1604.

Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations

Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Gurusamy Kayalvizhi et al. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: In children, manual dexterity poses a problem with the use of manual tooth brushes (MB), resulting in inefficient plaque removal. Recently, novel chewable brushes (CB) have been introduced which could overcome this problem but are less researched in children. The objective of this study is to assess and compare the plaque removal effectiveness of CB with that of MB.

Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients aged 8 to 10 years were enrolled in a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. At baseline, disclosing solution was applied and the Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein index (TQHI) plaque index and Loe and Silness gingival index were recorded. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups as group I (MB) and group II (CB) and they were instructed to use their respective brushes for a period of 1 week. For statistical comparison, the difference (prebrushing minus postbrushing) in average scores was calculated. Data were evaluated by the independent t test and paired t test, with p < 0.05.

Results: The overall plaque scores reduced from 1.71 ± 0.4 to 0.79 ± 0.24 when using CB and from 1.64 ± 0.64 to 1.13 ± 0.47 when using MBs. On lingual tooth surfaces, CB showed a plaque reduction of 38.70 ± 11.04 to 12.60 ± 4.79 compared to less reduction from 37.43 ± 14.26 to 28.73 ± 11.37 for MB. The overall gingival scores were also reduced from 0.33 ± 0.51 to 0.09 ± 0.07 when using CB and from 0.30 ± 0.33 to 0.19 ± 0.23 when using MB. Differences in scores between the two brushes were statistically significant (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion: It was concluded that the experimental CB was able to remove a significant amount of plaque, particularly on the lingual surfaces, and reduced gingival index scores, thereby improving oral hygiene and gingival health status.

How to cite this article: Kayalvizhi G, Radha S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Effectiveness of Manual and Chewable Toothbrushes in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):107-110.

Keywords: Chewable; Dental plaque index; Gingivitis; Oral health; Oral hygiene; Randomized clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Chewable brushes (Rolly Chewable Brush, UK) tied with dental floss

References

    1. Malekafzali B, Biria M, et al. Plaque removal by manual and electric toothbrushing among children. EMHJ. 2011;17(2):115–120. - PubMed
    1. Costa CC, Filho C, et al. Plaque removal by manual and electric toothbrushing among children. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2001;15(4):296–301. doi: 10.1590/S1517-74912001000400005. DOI: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Das UM, Singhal P. Tooth brushing skills for the children aged 3–11 years. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent. 2009;27(2):104–107. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.55335. DOI: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bezgin T, Dag C, et al. How effective is a chewable brush in removing plaque in children? A pilot study. J Pediatr Dent. 2015;3:41–45. doi: 10.4103/2321-6646.155557. DOI: - DOI
    1. Silverman J, Rosivack G, et al. Comparison of Powered and Manual Toothbrushes for Plaque Removal by 4- to 5-year-old Children. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:225–230. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources