Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):119-129.
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647385.

Development of Walking indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project

Affiliations

Development of Walking indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project

Kristin E Musselman et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the development of structure, process and outcome indicators that will advance the quality of walking rehabilitation for Canadians with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) by 2020. Method: A framework for the evaluation of the quality of walking rehabilitation was developed by experts in walking after SCI/D. A systematic literature review identified factors influencing walking outcomes and potential walking indicators. A Driver diagram analysis summarized the factors affecting walking outcomes and subsequently informed the selection of structure and process indicators. Psychometric properties and clinical utility of potential walking indicators were considered during the selection of outcome indicators. Results: The structure indicator is the number of physical therapists using evidence-based walking interventions per number of ambulatory individuals with SCI/D. The process indicator is the number of received hours of walking interventions during inpatient rehabilitation per number of ambulatory individuals with SCI/D. The intermediary outcome indicator, which is collected at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, is either the modified Timed Up and Go or the 10-Meter Walk Test, the choice of measure is dictated by the stage of walking recovery, as defined by the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool. The final outcome indicator, collected at 18 months post-discharge, is the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Mobility subscale. Conclusion: The selected indicators align with current clinical practice in Canada. The indicators will direct the timing and enhance the volume of walking therapy delivered, to ultimately increase the proportion of patients who achieve their walking potential by 18 months post-rehabilitation.

Keywords: Gait; Healthcare Quality indicators; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries; Walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Walking Domain Driver diagram. UEMS: Upper-Extremity Motor Score; LEMS: Lower-Extremity Motor Score; NLI: Neurological Level of Injury; AIS: ASIA Impairment Scale; HR: Heart Rate; BP: Blood Pressure; 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; FES: Functional Electrical Stimulation; FET: Functional Electrical Training; PSW: Personal Support Worker.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SCI-High Walking and Wheeled Mobility Domain indicator decision tree. Appropriate indicator data collection in based on the patient's stage of standing and walking recovery ascertained using the Canadian SCI Standing and Walking Assessment Tool. The Figure is intended to help clinicians decide when it is appropriate or not to collect Walking or Wheeled Mobility indicators, or both, based on the individual's stage of standing and walking recovery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(10):1371–83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ditunno PL, Patrick M, Stineman M, Ditunno JF.. Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(7):500–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102172 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burns AS, Marino RJ, Flanders AE, Flett H.. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:47–62. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00003-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marino RJ, Ditunno JF Jr, Donovan WH, Maynard F Jr. Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11):1391–6. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90249-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Torre M, Molinari M.. Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8(141):1–11. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms