Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Oct 1;21(10):e14407.
doi: 10.2196/14407.

Tailored Web-Based Information for Younger and Older Patients with Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Preparatory Educational Intervention on Patient Outcomes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Tailored Web-Based Information for Younger and Older Patients with Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Preparatory Educational Intervention on Patient Outcomes

Minh Hao Nguyen et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Many patients with cancer, including older patients (aged ≥65 years), consult the Web to prepare for their doctor's visit. In particular, older patients have varying needs regarding the mode in which information is presented (eg, via textual, visual, or audiovisual modes) owing to age-related sensory (eg, impaired vision and hearing) and cognitive decline (eg, reduced processing speed). Therefore, Web-based information targeted at older patient populations is likely to be used and processed more effectively, and evaluated more positively, when tailored to age-related capabilities and preferences. This, in turn, may benefit patient outcomes.

Objective: This randomized controlled trial tested the effects of a Web-based tailored educational intervention among newly diagnosed younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients with cancer. We compared the intervention group who viewed a mode-tailored website (ie, enabling patients to tailor information using textual, visual, and audiovisual modes) with 3 control groups view a nontailored website (ie, text only, text with images, and text with videos). We examined website experience outcomes (ie, website satisfaction, website involvement, knowledge, anxiety, and communication self-efficacy) and consultation experience outcomes (ie, question asking during consultation, anxiety, and information recall).

Methods: Patients from a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic (N=232) viewed a mode-tailored or nontailored website as preparation before their hospital consultations to discuss diagnosis and treatment. Data were collected before (T1), during (T2), and after (T3) visitation. Website experience outcomes were assessed with questionnaires (T1). Patients' question asking was coded from videotaped consultations, and anxiety was assessed through a questionnaire (T2). Telephone interviews were conducted to assess knowledge acquired from the website before (T1) and after consultation (T3), and information recall from the consultation (T3).

Results: The preparatory website was well used across all conditions (mean 34 min). Younger patients viewing the mode-tailored website were more satisfied before consultation (P=.02) and reported lower anxiety after consultation (P=.046; vs text only). This pattern was not found in older patients. Mode tailoring yielded no other significant differences in patient outcomes. Regression analyses showed that website involvement (beta=.15; P=.03) and, to a lesser extent, website satisfaction (beta=.15; P=.05) positively associated with knowledge before consultation (T1). In turn, higher knowledge before consultation (beta=.39; P<.001), together with time on the website (beta=.21; P=.002; T1), predicted information recall from consultations (T3). Patients with higher knowledge before consultation (T1) also reported higher knowledge from the website afterward (T3; beta=.22; P=.003).

Conclusions: Offering preparatory online information before consultations benefits information processing and patient outcomes of both younger and older newly diagnosed patients with cancer. Younger patients benefit even more when information is offered in a mode-tailored manner. We discuss the theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for patient-provider communication research in an electronic health era.

Clinical trial: Netherlands Trial Register NTR5904; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5750.

Keywords: Web-based tailoring; aging; anxiety; audiovisual media; cancer; consultation; health communication; internet; memory; patient education; patient participation; patient reported outcomes; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

None
Flowchart of participant recruitment and drop-out.
None
Example of the mode-tailored website with all modes switched on (text, images, videos).
None
Example of a non-tailored website with text and video.
None
Integrated model of website experience outcomes and consultation experience outcomes explaining knowledge/information recall.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pilleron S, Sarfati D, Janssen-Heijnen M, Vignat J, Ferlay J, Bray F, Soerjomataram I. Global cancer incidence in older adults, 2012 and 2035: a population-based study. Int J Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;144(1):49–58. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31664. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sparks L, Turner MM. The impact of cognitive and emotive communication barriers on older adult message processing of cancer-related health information: new directions for research. In: Sparks L, O'Hair H, Kreps G, editors. Cancer, Communication and Aging. New York: Hampton Press; 2008. pp. 17–47.
    1. Butow PN, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Jones QJ. Patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a question prompt sheet. Ann Oncol. 1994 Mar;5(3):199–204. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058793. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maliski SL, Kwan L, Krupski T, Fink A, Orecklin JR, Litwin MS. Confidence in the ability to communicate with physicians among low-income patients with prostate cancer. Urology. 2004 Aug;64(2):329–34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.042.S0090429504004145 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jansen J, Butow PN, van Weert JC, van Dulmen S, Devine RJ, Heeren TJ, Bensing JM, Tattersall MH. Does age really matter? Recall of information presented to newly referred patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5450–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2322.JCO.2007.15.2322 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources