Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;72(5):402-410.
doi: 10.1159/000502772. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem

Marina Englert  1   2 , Viviana Mendoza  3 , Mara Behlau  4   5 , Marc De Bodt  3   6   7
Affiliations

GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem

Marina Englert et al. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020.

Abstract

Objective: To propose a single qualifier scale for voice problems based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) that classifies a voice problem considering its multidimensionality.

Method: A multicultural database was analyzed (280 subjects). The analyzed information was: the perceptual judgment of the overall voice quality (G); the acoustic analysis (A) with the Acoustic Voice Quality Index; the laryngeal diagnosis (L) and the patient self-assessment (P) using the Voice Handicap Index. The variables were categorized. A 2-step cluster analysis was performed to define groups with common characteristics.

Results: A 7-point qualifier scale, the GALP, was defined to generally classify levels of voice problems considering 4 dimensions of the voice evaluation. Each level of voice problem, that is, no problem, mild, moderate, severe, or complete voice problem, has its own possible outcome for G, A, L, and P that will change, or not, the overall level of voice problem. The extremes of the scale represent "no problem" at all when all parameters are normal, and "complete problem" when all parameters are altered. The 3 levels in between were defined by the cluster analysis (mild, moderate, and severe problem) and change according to the outcome of each evaluation (G, A, L, and P). Thus, changes in one parameter alone may or not contribute to the change of the level of voice problem. Also, there are 2 categories for cases that do not fit the classification (not specified) and for which some of the variables are missing (not applicable).

Conclusion: The GALP scale was proposed to classify the level of voice problem. This approach considers important dimensions of voice evaluation according to the ICF. It is a potential tool to be used by different professionals, with different assessment procedures, and among different populations, clinicians, and study centers.

Keywords: Cluster analysis; Dysphonia; European Laryngological Society; GALP scale; International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health; Voice disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relative distribution of the variables in the clusters for the Brazilian (BR) Portuguese, Belgium (BE) Dutch and both databases.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Friedrich G, Dejonckere PH. [The voice evaluation protocol of the European Laryngological Society (ELS)— first results of a multicenter study] Laryngorhinootologie. 2005 Oct;84((10)):744–52. - PubMed
    1. Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York (NY): Springer Verlag; 1981.
    1. Lee YW, Kim GH, Bae IH, Park HJ, Wang SG, Kwon SB. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018 Dec;43((4)):175–80. - PubMed
    1. Simberg S, Laine A, Sala E, Rönnemaa AM. Prevalence of voice disorders among future teachers. J Voice. 2000 Jun;14((2)):231–5. - PubMed
    1. Yamasaki R, Madazio G, Leão SH, Padovani M, Azevedo R, Behlau M. Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Normal and Dysphonic Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale. J Voice. 2017 Jan;31((1)):67–71. - PubMed

Publication types