Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 1;124(11):1757-1764.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Versus Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Affiliations
Review

Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Versus Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Noman Lateef et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Patients having transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) routinely undergo coronary angiography before the procedure to define the coronary anatomy and to evaluate the extend of coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior/concomitant with TAVI confers any additional clinical benefit in patients with CAD remains unclear. Literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus from inception of these databases till April 2019. Included outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), acute kidney injury, and 1-year mortality. The main summary estimate was random effects odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven cohort studies enrolling 5,580 patients (mean age 82.4 years and 52.6% females) were included. Our study found no difference in effect estimates for 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.30 [0.85 to 1.98], p = 0.22, I2 = 37.5%), stroke (OR 0.7 (0.36 to 1.45), p = 0.36, I2 = 32.8%), MI (OR 2.71 [0.55 to 12.23], p = 0.22, I2 = 41.3%), acute kidney injury (OR 0.7 [0.46 to 1.06], p = 0.08, I2 = 14.4%) and 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 1.19 [0.92 to 1.52], p = 0.18, I2 = 0.0%) in patients who underwent TAVI with and without PCI. In conclusion, our analysis indicates that PCI with TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant CAD grants no additional clinical advantage in terms of patient important clinical outcomes. Further randomized studies are needed to better delineate the clinical practice for myocardial revascularization in patients receiving transcatheter therapy for aortic valve disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram illustrating study selection process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest Plot evaluating the cumulative risk of 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with TAVI and PCI versus TAVI Alone. Other annotations as in Figure 3. Squares represent the risk ratio of the individual studies; Horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the risk ratio. The size of the squares reflects the weight that the corresponding study contributes in the meta-analysis. The diamonds represent the pooled risk ratio or the overall effect. PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; TAVI = transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest Plot evaluating the cumulative risk of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with TAVI and PCI versus TAVI Alone. Other annotations as in Figure 2.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest Plot evaluating the cumulative risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with TAVI and PCI versus TAVI Alone. Other annotations as in Figure 2.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forest Plot evaluating the cumulative risk of stroke in patients with TAVI and PCI versus TAVI alone.

References

    1. Rodés-Cabau J, Webb JG, Cheung A, Ye J, Dumont E, Feindel CM, Osten M, Natarajan MK, Velianou JL, Martucci G, DeVarennes B, Chisholm R, Peterson MD, Lichtenstein SV, Nietlispach F, Doyle D, DeLarochelliére R, Teoh K, Chu V, Dancea A, Lachapelle K, Cheema A, Latter D, Horlick E. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multi-center Canadian experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1080–1090. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, Russo M, Kapadia SR, Malaisrie SC, Cohen DJ, Pibarot P, Leipsic J, Hahn RT, Blanke P, Williams MR, McCabe JM, Brown DL, Babaliaros V, Goldman S, Szeto WY, Genereux P, Pershad A, Pocock SJ, Alu MC, Webb JG, Smith CR, PARTNER 3 Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1695–1705. 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D, Bajwa T, Heiser JC, Merhi W, Kleiman NS, Askew J, Sorajja P, Rovin J, Chetcuti SJ, Adams DH, Teirstein PS, Zorn GL 3rd, Forrest JK, Tchétché D, Resar J, Walton A, Piazza N, Ramlawi B, Robinson N, Petrossian G, Gleason TG, Oh JK, Boulware MJ, Qiao H, Mugglin AS, Reardon MJ, Evolut Low Risk Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1706–1715. 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Culler SD, Cohen DJ, Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Reynolds MR, Ambrose K, Schlosser ML, Simon AW, Katz MR. Trends in aortic valve replacement procedures between 2009 and 2015: has transcatheter aortic valve replacement made a difference? Ann Thorac Surg 2018;105:1137–1143. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.057. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Voudris KV, Petropulos P, Karyofillis P, Charitakis K. Timing and outcomes of PCI in the TAVR era. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2018;20:22 10.1007/s11936-018-0619-x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms