Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Sep 30;9(9):e030366.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030366.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in couples with non-severe male infertility (NSMI-ICSI): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in couples with non-severe male infertility (NSMI-ICSI): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Danni Zheng et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), originally introduced as add-on to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) for couples with severe male infertility, is in current clinical practice also used in couples with mild male or even unexplained infertility. However, ICSI has involved unresolved concerns regarding the selection and damage to gametes and the health conditions of the offspring, and it is also labour intensive and therefore more expensive than conventional IVF. High-quality well-powered randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ICSI and IVF are lacking.

Methods and analysis: We propose a multicentre, open-label RCT in 10 reproductive medical centres across China. We will study couples with non-severe male infertility (defined as a semen concentrate 5-15×106/mL or sperm with a progressive motility 10%-32%) scheduled for their first or second ICSI or IVF cycle, as low fertility rate after fertilisation are more frequent in this population, which could lead to controversy about ICSI or conventional IVF for fertilisation. On the day of oocyte retrieval, eligible participants are after informed consent be randomised to undergo either ICSI or conventional IVF in a 1:1 treatment ratio. Other standard assisted reproductive treatments are similar and parallel between two groups. Our primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth after the first cycle with embryo transfer. To demonstrate or refute a difference of 7% between ICSI and conventional IVF, we need to include 2346 women (1173 in each intervention arm). In addition, we will follow-up neonatal outcomes after delivery to identify the influence of ICSI on offspring.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from Peking University Third Hospital medical science research ethics committee. The findings will be disseminated to the public through conference presentations and peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03298633).

Keywords: assisted reproductive technology; in vitro fertilisation; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; non-severe male infertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart followed SPIRIT checklist showing patient enrolment, allocation, treatment and follow-up of participants. ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilisation; SPIRIT, Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krausz C. Male infertility: pathogenesis and clinical diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;25:271–85. 10.1016/j.beem.2010.08.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hull MG, Glazener CM, Kelly NJ, et al. . Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. BMJ 1985;291:1693–7. 10.1136/bmj.291.6510.1693 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crosignani PG, Walters DE. Clinical pregnancy and male subfertility; the ESHRE multicentre trial on the treatment of male subfertility. European Society of human reproduction and embryology. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1112–8. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138642 - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Donovan PA, Vandekerckhove P, Lilford RJ, et al. . Infertility:Treatment of male infertility: is it effective? Review and meta-analyses of published randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1209–22. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138230 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tournaye H. Male factor infertility and ART. Asian J Androl 2012;14:103–8. 10.1038/aja.2011.65 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data