Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 30;9(9):e032353.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032353.

Evidence map of pancreatic surgery: protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Evidence map of pancreatic surgery: protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis

Pascal Probst et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic surgery is a large and complex field of research. Several evidence gaps exist for specific diseases or surgical procedures. An overview on existing knowledge is needed to plan and prioritise future research. The aim of this project is to create a systematic and living evidence map of pancreatic surgery.

Methods and analysis: A systematic literature search in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be performed searching for all randomised controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews (SR) on pancreatic surgery. RCT and SR will be grouped in research topics. Baseline and outcome data from RCT will be extracted, presented and effect sizes meta-analysed. Data from SR will be used to identify evidence gaps. A freely accessible web-based evidence map in the format of a mind map will be created. The evidence map and meta-analyses will be updated periodically.

Dissemination: After completion of the project, a permanently updated evidence map of pancreatic surgery will be available to patients, physicians, researchers and funding bodies via www.evidencemap.surgery. Its use will allow clinical decision-making based on primary data and prioritisation of future research endeavours.

Prospero registration number: CRD42019133444.

Keywords: evidence management; evidence map; living review; meta-analysis; pancreatic surgery; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of the possible structure of the evidence map (www.evidencemap.surgery). GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations; MA, meta-analyses; RCT, randomised controlled trials; SR, systematic reviews.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of existing literature (RCT and SR) and living meta-analysis for a research topic (www.evidencemap.surgery). GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations; MA, meta-analyses; PPPR, pylorus preservation vs plyorus resection; RCT, randomised controlled trials; SR, systematic reviews.

References

    1. Hüttner FJ, Capdeville L, Pianka F, et al. . Systematic review of the quantity and quality of randomized clinical trials in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2019;106:23–31. 10.1002/bjs.11030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, et al. . Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Ann Surg 2008;247:456–62. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181613142 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Majumder S, Chari ST. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet 2016;387:1957–66. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00097-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sánchez-Velázquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, et al. . Benchmarks in pancreatic surgery: a novel tool for unbiased outcome comparisons. Ann Surg 2019;270:211–8. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003223 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. . The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017;161:584–91. 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types