Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 23:11:141-147.
doi: 10.2147/ORR.S212998. eCollection 2019.

Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation)

Seyed Mahdi Hosseini Khameneh  1 , Mohammadreza Abbasian  1 , Hashem Abrishamkarzadeh  1   2 , Shahab Bagheri  3 , Fahimeh Abdollahimajd  4 , Farshad Safdari  5 , Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan  6
Affiliations

Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation)

Seyed Mahdi Hosseini Khameneh et al. Orthop Res Rev. .

Abstract

Purpose: This randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the outcomes of humeral shaft-fracture management with the functional Sarmiento brace (nonoperative) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

Methods: Sixty humeral shaft-fracture patients with a minimum age of 18 years were randomly assigned into two groups: operative treatment with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or functional brace (Sarmiento). A similar postoperative rehabilitation program was applied for all subjects for the next 12 months. The outcomes of each method were measured in terms of nonunion rate, union time, "quick" Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, and rate of complications, such as malunion, infection, and radial nerve injury.

Results: The two groups had similar baseline characteristics, including age, sex, smoking status, and type and mechanism of fracture. The mean union time was about 4.8 weeks shorter in the ORIF group (13.9 weeks in operative group versus 18.7 weeks in nonoperative group), indicating a definite significant superiority (p=0.001) of ORIF management to functional Sarmiento bracing. However, a comparison of quick DASH scores revealed a borderline-significant difference between the groups (p=0.065). Additionally, we found that treatment of humeral shaft fractures using functional bracing was associated with slightly higher risk of nonunion; however this was not significant (p=0.492).

Conclusion: According to the present findings, there is remarkable superiority of ORIF over functional Sarmiento bracing in the management of patients with humeral shaft fracture.

Keywords: diaphyseal fracture; functional brace; malunion; nonunion; open reduction internal fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This RCT had no funding source and the authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–697. - PubMed
    1. Malhan S, Thomas S, Srivastav S, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking compression plate for diaphyseal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012;20(3):292–296. - PubMed
    1. Cole PA, Wijdicks CA. The operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures. Hand Clin. 2007;23(4):437–448. - PubMed
    1. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(11):1469–1473. - PubMed
    1. Pogliacomi F, Devecchi A, Costantino C, Vaienti E. Functional long-term outcome of the shoulder after antegrade intramedullary nailing in humeral diaphyseal fractures. Chir Organi Mov. 2008;92(1):11–16. - PubMed