One step forward, two steps backward
- PMID: 31578472
- DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0660-5
One step forward, two steps backward
Comment in
-
Response to Gomy and Garber.Genet Med. 2020 Feb;22(2):443. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0661-4. Epub 2019 Oct 3. Genet Med. 2020. PMID: 31578473 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
The use of ACMG secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genet Med. 2019 Jul;21(7):1467-1468. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0502-5. Epub 2019 Apr 25. Genet Med. 2019. PMID: 31019278 No abstract available.
References
-
- ACMG Board of Directors. The use of ACMG secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2019;21:1467–1468. - DOI
-
- Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, et al. ACMG Policy Statement ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:565–574. - DOI
-
- Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SFv2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017;19:249–255. - DOI
-
- Pet DB, Holm IA, Williams JL. et al. Physicians’ perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results. Genet Med. 2019;21:311–318. - DOI
-
- Ormondroyd E, Mackley MP, Blair E, et al. “Not pathogenic until proven otherwise”: perspectives of UK clinical genomics professionals toward secondary findings in context of a Genomic Medicine Multidisciplinary Team and the 100,000 Genomes Project. Genet Med. 2018;20:320–328. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources