Response to Gomy and Garber
- PMID: 31578473
- DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0661-4
Response to Gomy and Garber
Comment on
-
The use of ACMG secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genet Med. 2019 Jul;21(7):1467-1468. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0502-5. Epub 2019 Apr 25. Genet Med. 2019. PMID: 31019278 No abstract available.
-
One step forward, two steps backward.Genet Med. 2020 Feb;22(2):441-442. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0660-5. Epub 2019 Oct 3. Genet Med. 2020. PMID: 31578472 No abstract available.
References
-
- Gomy I, Garber J. Response to the ACMG secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med (in press).
-
- ACMG Board of Directors. The use of secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2019;21:1467–1468. - DOI
-
- American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. ACMG releases clarification statement on “The use of ACMG secondary findings recommendations for general population screening.” https://www.acmg.net/PDFLibrary/Clarification Released -should Secondary Findings in Genetics Be Used for General Population Screening.pdf . Accessed May 2019.
-
- ACMG Board of Directors. ACMG response to Nussbaum et al. letter on ACMG policy statement: the use of secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the ACMG. Genet Med. 2019 Jun 26; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0573-3 [Epub ahead of print].
-
- Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, et al. ACMG recommendations of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:565–574. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources