Reply to 'Strengths and limitations of estimated and measured GFR'
- PMID: 31578496
- DOI: 10.1038/s41581-019-0214-8
Reply to 'Strengths and limitations of estimated and measured GFR'
Comment on
-
Estimated GFR: time for a critical appraisal.Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Mar;15(3):177-190. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0080-9. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019. PMID: 30518813 Review.
-
Strengths and limitations of estimated and measured GFR.Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Dec;15(12):784. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0213-9. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019. PMID: 31578495 No abstract available.
References
-
- Porrini, E. et al. Estimated GFR: time for a critical appraisal. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 15, 177–190 (2019). - DOI
-
- Levey, A. et al. Strengths and limitations of estimated and measured GFR. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. https://doi.org/s41581-019-0213-9 (2019).
-
- Stevens, L. A. et al. Impact of creatinine calibration on performance of GFR estimating equations in a pooled individual patient database. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 50, 21–35 (2007). - DOI
-
- Barroso, S. et al. Accuracy of indirect estimates of renal function in advanced chronic renal failure patients. Nefrologia 26, 344–350 (2006). - PubMed
-
- Froissart, M. et al. Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft–Gault equations for estimating renal function. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 16, 763–773 (2005). - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources