Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 13;4(3):e178.
doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000178. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.

A Strategy for the Renovation of a Clinical Pathways Program

Affiliations

A Strategy for the Renovation of a Clinical Pathways Program

Aimee Pugh-Bernard et al. Pediatr Qual Saf. .

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical pathways (CPs) translate best available evidence to the local care context and intend to inform clinical decision-making, optimize care, and decrease variation. This article describes a CPs program improvement process at a free-standing academic children's hospital. Aims: (1) improve the pathway development process; (2) identify and address gaps; (3) strengthen measurement; (4) increase efficiency in cycle time to build a pathway; (5) increase multidisciplinary participation; (6) integrate into the electronic health record ; and (7) and increase pathway utilization.

Methods: We renovated the CP program using a structured, improvement process. A series of internal stakeholder and external colleague interviews informed the process. To improve the program, we developed and implemented different interventions.

Results: The streamlined process reduced the overall time for completion from a median of 15 to 5 months (measured from the date of first meeting with the clinical improvement team to approval), a 70% increase in efficiency. Between 1994 and 2015, the hospital had 33 CPs. There was a 78% increase in the total number of pathways after the renovation with 26 additional pathways.

Conclusions: Renovation of the CP program led to early success through an improved development process, alleviation of programmatic gaps, inclusion of measures within each pathway, increased timely completion, multidisciplinary involvement, integration into the electronic health record, and improved utilization. Initial results are encouraging, and the lessons learned should be helpful to other programs. Further program development is ongoing, focusing on continued improvements in implementation and overall program measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Clinical pathway development timeline for new pathways.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Clinical pathway development process map for new pathways.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Campbell H, Hotchkiss R, Bradshaw N, et al. Integrated care pathways. BMJ. 1998;316:133–137. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kinsman L, Rotter T, James E, et al. What is a clinical pathway? Development of a definition to inform the debate. BMC Med. 2010;8:31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawal AK, Rotter T, Kinsman L, et al. What is a clinical pathway? Refinement of an operational definition to identify clinical pathway studies for a Cochrane systematic review. BMC Med. 2016;14:35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rotter T, Kinsman L, James EL, et al. Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2010. - PubMed
    1. Saint S, Hofer TP, Rose JS, et al. Use of critical pathways to improve efficiency: a cautionary tale. Am J Manag Care. 2003;9:758–765. - PubMed