Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1420-1435.
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1589. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014

Cara T Mai  1 , Jennifer L Isenburg  1 , Mark A Canfield  2 , Robert E Meyer  3   4 , Adolfo Correa  5 , Clinton J Alverson  1 , Philip J Lupo  6 , Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso  1 , Sook Ja Cho  7 , Deepa Aggarwal  8 , Russell S Kirby  9 ; National Birth Defects Prevention Network
Affiliations

National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014

Cara T Mai et al. Birth Defects Res. .

Abstract

Background: Using the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) annual data report, U.S. national prevalence estimates for major birth defects are developed based on birth cohort 2010-2014.

Methods: Data from 39 U.S. population-based birth defects surveillance programs (16 active case-finding, 10 passive case-finding with case confirmation, and 13 passive without case confirmation) were used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates for major defects by case-finding approach. Fourteen active case-finding programs including at least live birth and stillbirth pregnancy outcomes monitoring approximately one million births annually were used to develop national prevalence estimates, adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity (for all conditions examined) and maternal age (trisomies and gastroschisis). These calculations used a similar methodology to the previous estimates to examine changes over time.

Results: The adjusted national birth prevalence estimates per 10,000 live births ranged from 0.62 for interrupted aortic arch to 16.87 for clubfoot, and 19.93 for the 12 critical congenital heart defects combined. While the birth prevalence of most birth defects studied remained relatively stable over 15 years, an increasing prevalence was observed for gastroschisis and Down syndrome. Additionally, the prevalence for atrioventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, omphalocele, and trisomy 18 increased in this period compared to the previous periods. Active case-finding programs generally had higher prevalence rates for most defects examined, most notably for anencephaly, anophthalmia/microphthalmia, trisomy 13, and trisomy 18.

Conclusion: National estimates of birth defects prevalence provide data for monitoring trends and understanding the impact of these conditions. Increasing prevalence rates observed for selected conditions warrant further examination.

Keywords: United States; birth defects; congenital anomalies; national estimates; population-based surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Distribution of prevalence of 29 selected defects from active population-based surveillance systems, 2010–2014 (n = 14)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderka M, Mai CT, Romitti PA, Copeland G, Isenburg J, Feldkamp ML, … Kirby RS (2015). Development and implementation of the first national data quality standards for population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. BMC Public Health, 15, 925. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arth AC, Tinker SC, Simeone RM, Ailes EC, Cragan JD, & Grosse SD (2017). Inpatient hospitalization costs associated with birth defects among persons of all ages—United States, 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(2), 41–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry RJ, Li Z, Erickson JD, Li S, Moore CA, Wang H, … Correa A. (1999). Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China. China-U.S. collaborative project for neural tube defect prevention. The New England Journal of Medicine, 341(20), 1485–1490. - PubMed
    1. Bower C, Rudy E, Callaghan A, Quick J, & Nassar N (2010). Age at diagnosis of birth defects. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 88, 251–255. - PubMed
    1. Canfield MA, Honein MA, Yuskiv N, Xing J, Mai CT, Collins JS, … Kirby RS (2006). National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999–2001. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 76(11), 747–756. - PubMed

MeSH terms