Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):330-340.
doi: 10.1177/1062860619879746. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

Integrating Lean Thinking and Implementation Science Determinants Checklists for Quality Improvement: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Integrating Lean Thinking and Implementation Science Determinants Checklists for Quality Improvement: A Scoping Review

Taylor Standiford et al. Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jul/Aug.

Abstract

It is not known how often lean tools and implementation determinants frameworks or checklists are used concurrently in health care quality improvement activities. The authors systematically reviewed the literature for studies that used a lean tool along with an implementation science determinants framework (January 1999 through August 2018). Seven studies (8 publications) were identified, inclusive of 2 protocols and 6 research articles across multiple continents. All included studies used the consolidated framework for implementation research as their implementation science determinants framework. Lean tools included in more than 1 publication were process mapping (4 publications), process redesign (3 publications), and 5S standardization (2 publications). Only 1 study proposed using a lean tool concurrently with an implementation science determinants framework in the design and execution of the QI project. Few published studies utilize both an implementation science determinants framework or checklist and 1 or more lean tool in their study design.

Keywords: implementation science; lean; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart for study inclusion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A3 template for quality improvement work: This figure integrates implementation science determinants frameworks and checklists into the “Analysis,” “Recommendations,” and “Plan” sections of a typical lean A3 template.

References

    1. Schouten LM, Hulscher ME, van Everdingen JJ, Huijsman R, Grol RP. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;336: 1491–1494. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wells S, Tamir O, Gray J, Naidoo D, Bekhit M, Goldmann D. Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27:226–240. - PubMed
    1. Deblois S, Lepanto L. Lean and six sigma in acute care: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29:192–208. - PubMed
    1. Graban M Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Engagement. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Productivity Press/Taylor & Francis; 2012.
    1. Vest JR, Gamm LD. A critical review of the research literature on six sigma, lean and StuderGroup’s hardwiring excellence in the United States: the need to demonstrate and communicate the effectiveness of transformation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2009;4:35. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms