Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Oct 3;19(1):682.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4397-2.

Person-centred, integrated and pro-active care for multi-morbid elderly with advanced care needs: a propensity score-matched controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Person-centred, integrated and pro-active care for multi-morbid elderly with advanced care needs: a propensity score-matched controlled trial

G K R Berntsen et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Person-centred care (PCC) focusing on personalised goals and care plans derived from "What matters to you?" has an impact on single disease outcomes, but studies on multi-morbid elderly are lacking. Furthermore, the combination of PCC, Integrated Care (IC) and Pro-active care are widely recognised as desirable for multi-morbid elderly, yet previous studies focus on single components only, leaving synergies unexplored. The effect of a synergistic intervention, which implements 1) Person-centred goal-oriented care driven by "What matters to you?" with 2) IC and 3) pro-active care is unknown.

Methods: Inspired by theoretical foundations, complexity science, previous health service research and a patient-driven evaluation of care quality, we designed the Patient-Centred Team (PACT) intervention across primary and secondary care. The PACT team collaborate with the patient to make and deliver a person-centred, integrated and proactive multi-morbidity care-plan. The control group receives conventional care. The study design is a pragmatic six months prospective, controlled clinical trial based on hospital electronic health record data of 439 multi-morbid frail elderly at risk for emergency (re) admissions referred to PACT and 779 propensity score matched controls in Norway, 2014-2016. Outcomes are emergency admissions, the sum of emergency inpatient bed days, 30-day readmissions, planned and emergency outpatient visits and mortality at three and six months follow-up.

Results: The Rate Ratios (RR) for emergency admissions was 0,9 (95%CI: 0,82-0,99), for sum of emergency bed days 0,68 (95%CI:0,52-0,79) and for 30-days emergency readmissions 0,72 (95%CI: 0,41-1,24). RRs were 2,3 (95%CI: 2,02-2,55) and 0,9 (95%CI: 0,68-1,20) for planned and emergency outpatient visits respectively. The RR for death at 3 months was 0,39 (95% CI: 0,22-0,70) and 0,57 (95% CI: 0,34-0,94) at 6 months.

Conclusion: Compared with propensity score matched controls, the care process of frail multi-morbid elderly who received the PACT intervention had a reduced risk of high-level emergency care, increased use of low-level planned care, and substantially reduced mortality risk. Further study of process differences between groups is warranted to understand the genesis of these results better.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02541474 ), registered Sept 2015.

Keywords: Health care utilisation; Integrated care; Mortality; Person-centred care; Proactive care; Propensity score matched controls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Inclusion and exclusion Flowchart. Legend: The figure shows eligible PACT patients and exclusions at the person level. The Patient-Centred Team (PACT)-study, Norway 2014–16
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mortality. Legend: Crude Kaplan-Meier curves, showing the proportion of patients alive by time, and group in 6 months follow-up period. Pooled data, (N = 1218). The Patient-Centred Team (PACT)-study, Norway 2014–16

References

    1. Tinetti ME, Fried T, Boyd C. Designing health care for the most common chronic condition—multimorbidity. JAMA. 2012;307:2493–2494. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bayliss EA, Edwards AE, Steiner JF, Main DS. Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities. Fam Pract. 2008;25:287–293. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallace E, Salisbury C, Guthrie B, Lewis C, Fahey T, Smith SM. Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care. BMJ. 2015;350:1–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h176. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, Gibson TB, Marder WD, Weiss KB, Blumenthal D, Vogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, et al. Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(Suppl 3):391–395. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heiberg I. High utilisation patients in somatic specialist healthcare in Northern Norway. [Storforbrukere av somatisk spesialisthelsetjeneste i Helse Nord] [https://helse-nord.no/Documents/SKDE/SKDE%20Publikasjoner/Storforbrukere...] Accessed on date: 2015-12-06

Publication types

Associated data