Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2019 Oct;181(2):387-388.
doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01025.

The Heat Is On: Maize Pollen Development after a Heat Wave

Affiliations
Comment

The Heat Is On: Maize Pollen Development after a Heat Wave

Lisa M Smith. Plant Physiol. 2019 Oct.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Transiently heat stressed maize pollen has reduced fertility. When non-heat-stressed female parents are fertilized with pollen from heat-stressed plants, seed set is severely reduced (right) compared to fertilization with control non-heat-stressed pollen (left). Reprint of figure 3F in Begcy et al. (2019).

Comment on

References

    1. Begcy K, Nosenko T, Zhou L-Z, Fragner L, Weckwerth W, Dresselhaus T (2019) Male sterility in maize after transient heat stress during the tetrad stage of pollen development. Plant Physiol 181: 683–700 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonne D, Heusele C, Simon C, Pantaloni D (1985) 4′, 6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole, a fluorescent probe for tubulin and microtubules. J Biol Chem 260: 2819–2825 - PubMed
    1. Erickson A, Markhart A (2002) Flower developmental stage and organ sensitivity of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to elevated temperature. Plant Cell Environ 25: 123–130
    1. Giorno F, Wolters-Arts M, Mariani C, Rieu I (2013) Ensuring reproduction at high temperatures: The heat stress response during anther and pollen development. Plants 2: 489–506 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim SY, Hong CB, Lee I (2001) Heat shock stress causes stage-specific male sterility in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Res 114: 301–307