Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jan;34(1):31-38.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07161-7. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis

Jaime Hislop et al. Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The repetitive and forceful motions used by operating surgeons increase the risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders. Most ergonomists consider the surgical environment to be incredibly harsh for its workers. Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery (TLS) in particular has a number of physical and mental challenges associated with it, and while Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (RALS) provides several features that improve upon TLS, some surgeons have still reported musculoskeletal symptoms they attribute to RALS. In this paper, we endeavored to systematically review muscle activation for both TLS and RALS, to compare the modalities and present the results as a meta-analysis.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases in November 2018 with the following inclusion criteria: full text was available in English, the paper contained original data, EMG was one of the primary measurement techniques, and the paper included EMG data for both TLS and RALS. Results from studies were compared using standardized mean difference analysis.

Results: A total of 379 papers were found, and through screening ten were selected for inclusion. Sample populations ranged from 1 to 31 surgeons, and a variety of study designs and metrics were used between studies. The biceps were the only muscle group that consistently and significantly demonstrated lower muscle activation for RALS for all included studies.

Conclusions: The results may support the belief that RALS is ergonomically superior to TLS, shown through generally lower muscle activation scores. However, these results must be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity between the studies and multiple potential sources for bias within studies. This analysis would be strengthened with a higher number of homogenous, high-quality studies examining larger sample sizes.

Keywords: Electromyography; Musculoskeletal disorders; Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS); Traditional laparoscopic surgery (TLS).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):516-526 - PubMed
    1. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Apr;19(2):105-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Med Robot. 2013 Jun;9(2):142-7 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1119-1135 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2004 Aug;18(8):1231-41 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources