Semen cryopreservation in adolescent and adult men undergoing fertility compromising cancer treatment: A systematic review
- PMID: 31583728
- DOI: 10.1111/and.13392
Semen cryopreservation in adolescent and adult men undergoing fertility compromising cancer treatment: A systematic review
Abstract
Treatment-related infertility is a common problem in cancer survivors. Semen cryopreservation is the most established option for male oncological patients wishing to preserve their fertility. We conducted a systematic review to analyse the existing literature regarding the frequency of offers and attempts of semen cryopreservation. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for eligible literature without restrictions to language, study type or year of publication. Two authors independently screened and evaluated the citations for eligibility. Studies were included if they reported on pubertal or post-pubertal patients at risk of fertility impairment prior to their cancer therapy. We excluded studies neither reporting the prevalence of offer nor attempt of semen cryopreservation. Possible factors for heterogeneity between the studies were examined by meta-regression analyses. Out of 6,105 returned citations, 42 studies were included in the analysis. The prevalence of offer varied from 8% to 100% and corresponding attempts ranged from 3% to 79%, showing a vast heterogeneity with inconsistent reporting of influencing variables. Measured by the number of scientific publications, the awareness for fertility preservation is increasing while actual prevalences are diverse. In order to identify variables influencing offer and attempt prevalences, consistent reporting of a core set of factors is required.
Keywords: cancer; infertility; semen cryopreservation.
© 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Achille, M. A., Rosberger, Z., Robitaille, R., Lebel, S., Gouin, J. P., Bultz, B. D., & Chan, P. T. K. (2006). Facilitators and obstacles to sperm banking in young men receiving gonadotoxic chemotherapy for cancer: The perspective of survivors and health care professionals. Human Reproduction, 21, 3206-3216. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del307
-
- Armuand, G. M., Rodriguez-Wallberg, K. A., Wettergren, L., Ahlgren, J., Enblad, G., Hoglund, M., & Lampic, C. (2012). Sex differences in fertility-related information received by young adult cancer survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30, 2147-2153. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.40.6470
-
- Babb, A., Farah, N., Lyons, C., Lindsay, K., Reddy, N., Goldman, J., … Salooja, N. (2011). Uptake and outcome of assisted reproductive techniques in long-term survivors of SCT. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 47, 568-573. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.134
-
- Bann, C. M., Treiman, K., Squiers, L., Tzeng, J., Nutt, S., Arvey, S., … Rechis, R. (2015). Cancer survivors' use of fertility preservation. Journal of Women's Health, 24, 1030-1037. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.5160
-
- Boltezar, L., Pintaric, K., & Jezersek Novakovic, B. (2016). Fertility in young patients following treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma: A single center survey. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(3), 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0636-6
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
