Standardising the interpretation of liver biopsies in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease clinical trials
- PMID: 31583739
- PMCID: PMC6817398
- DOI: 10.1111/apt.15503
Standardising the interpretation of liver biopsies in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease clinical trials
Abstract
Background: There is substantial variation in how histologic definitions and scoring systems of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are operationalised.
Aim: To develop a consensus-based framework for standardising histologic assessment of liver biopsies in clinical trials of NAFLD.
Methods: An expert panel of 14 liver pathologists and three hepatologists was assembled. Using modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology, 130 items derived from literature review and expert opinion were rated by each panel member on a 1-9 scale. Disagreement was defined as ≥5 ratings in the lowest (1-3) and highest (7-9) categories. Items were classified as inappropriate (median 1-3.5 without disagreement), uncertain (median 3.5-6.5 or any median with disagreement) or appropriate (median 6.5-9 without disagreement). Survey results were discussed as a group before voting.
Results: Current measures of disease activity and fibrosis may not fully capture important features of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Alternative methods to evaluate ballooning degeneration are needed. Panellists were uncertain whether portal inflammation, degree of steatosis and Mallory-Denk bodies are important measures of disease activity. Furthermore, it was felt that current staging systems do not capture the full spectrum of fibrosis in NASH. A consensus definition and sub-stages for bridging fibrosis are needed. The severity of perisinusoidal fibrosis should be captured at all stages. Lastly, a method to evaluate features of fibrosis regression should be developed.
Conclusion: The operating properties of the modifications proposed should be evaluated prospectively to determine reliability and responsiveness.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
STATEMENT OF INTERESTS
Authors’ declaration of personal interests:
Comment in
-
Editorial: evolving histological assessment of NASH.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Dec;50(11-12):1243-1244. doi: 10.1111/apt.15537. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019. PMID: 31709610 No abstract available.
-
Editorial: evolving histological assessment of NASH. Authors' reply.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Dec;50(11-12):1245-1246. doi: 10.1111/apt.15570. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019. PMID: 31709613 No abstract available.
References
-
- Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018;67:328–357. - PubMed
-
- Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016;64:73–84. - PubMed
-
- Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;15:11–20. - PubMed
-
- Estes C, Anstee QM, Arias-Loste MT, et al. Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016–2030. J Hepatol 2018;69:896–904. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical