Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912565.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12565.

Association of Histologic Disease Activity With Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Affiliations

Association of Histologic Disease Activity With Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

David E Kleiner et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: The histologic evolution of the full spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and factors associated with progression or regression remain to be definitively established.

Objective: To evaluate the histologic evolution of NAFLD and the factors associated with changes in disease severity over time.

Design, setting, and participants: A prospective cohort substudy from the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) NAFLD Database study, a noninterventional registry, was performed at 8 university medical research centers. Masked assessment of liver histologic specimens was performed, using a prespecified protocol to score individual biopsies. Participants included 446 adults with NAFLD enrolled in the NASH CRN Database studies between October 27, 2004, and September 13, 2013, who underwent 2 liver biopsies 1 or more year apart. Data analysis was performed from October 2016 to October 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: Progression and regression of fibrosis stage, using clinical, laboratory, and histologic findings, including the NAFLD activity score (NAS) (sum of scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning; range, 0-8, with 8 indicating more severe disease).

Results: A total of 446 adults (mean [SD] age, 47 [11] years; 294 [65.9%] women) with NAFLD (NAFL, 86 [19.3%]), borderline NASH (84 [18.8%]), and definite NASH (276 [61.9%]) were studied. Over a mean (SD) interval of 4.9 (2.8) years between biopsies, NAFL resolved in 11 patients (12.8%) and progressed to steatohepatitis in 36 patients (41.9%). Steatohepatitis resolved in 24 (28.6%) of the patients with borderline NASH and 61 (22.1%) of those with definite NASH. Fibrosis progression or regression by at least 1 stage occurred in 132 (30%) and 151 [34%] participants, respectively. Metabolic syndrome (20 [95%] vs 108 [72%]; P = .03), baseline NAS (mean [SD], 5.0 [1.4] vs 4.3 [1.6]; P = .005), and smaller reduction in NAS (-0.2 [2] vs -0.9 [2]; P < .001) were associated with progression to advanced (stage 3-4) fibrosis vs those without progression to stage 3 to 4 fibrosis. Fibrosis regression was associated with lower baseline insulin level (20 vs 33 μU/mL; P = .02) and decrease in all NAS components (steatosis grade -0.8 [0.1] vs -0.3 [0.9]; P < .001; lobular inflammation -0.5 [0.8] vs -0.2 [0.9]; P < .001; ballooning -0.7 [1.1] vs -0.1 [0.9]; P < .001). Only baseline aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were associated with fibrosis regression vs no change and progression vs no change on multivariable regression: baseline AST (regression: conditional odds ratio [cOR], 0.6 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7; P < .001; progression: cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = .002). Changes in the AST level, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, and NAS were also associated with fibrosis regression and progression (ΔAST level: regression, cOR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.2; P = .47; progression, cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = .02; ΔALT level: regression, cOR, 0.7 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9; P = .002; progression, cOR, 1.0 per 10 U/L AST; 95% CI, 0.9-1.2; P = .93; ΔNAS: regression, cOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9; P = .001; progression, cOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = .01).

Conclusions and relevance: Improvement or worsening of disease activity may be associated with fibrosis regression or progression, respectively, in NAFLD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Brunt reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) during the conduct of the study; and is a consulted for Arix, Cymabay, NGM, and Roth Capital Partners outside the submitted work. Ms Wilson reported receiving grants from NIDDK during the conduct of the study. Dr Behling reported receiving grants from the NIDDK during the conduct of the study; and is a consultant for ICON, COVANCE, Eli Lilly, Hologic, and Leica outside the submitted work. Dr Guy reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study and personal fees from CymaBay, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Madrigal, and Immuron outside the submitted work. Dr Cummings reported receiving grants from the NIDDK during the conduct of the study and is a consultant for Novo-Nordisk outside the submitted work. Dr Gill reported grants from the NIH/NIDDK during the conduct of the study. Dr Chalasani reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Shire, Madrigal, Allergan, NuSirt, Afimmune, Siemens, and Genentech, and grants from Exact Sciences, Galectin Therapeutics, and Intercept during the conduct of the study. Dr Neuschwander-Tetri reported receiving grants from the NIDDK during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Allergan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Enanta, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, and Prometheus; personal fees from Arrowhead, ARTham, Blade, Boehringer Ingleheim, Coherus, Consynance, Durect, Fortress, Gelesis, Lipocine, Medimmune, Merck, Metacrine, Mundipharma, pH-Pharma, Siemens, Karos, and Lexicon; and grants from Cirius, Cymabay, Galectin, and Genfit outside the submitted work. Dr Dasarathy reported receiving grants from the NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr Kowdley reported receiving grants from the NIDDK during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Allergan, Conatus, Enanta, Gilead, Intercept, Merck, NGM, and Biopharma; personal fees from Corcept, Oxford Pharmagenesis, IQVIA Inc, and Verylx; and grants from Galectin, Immuron, and Prometheus outside the submitted work. Ms Belt reported receiving grants from the NIDDK during the conduct of the study. Dr Tonascia reported receiving grants from the NIDDK during the conduct of the study and grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and National Institute on Aging outside the submitted work. Dr Lavine reported receiving personal fees from Merck, TARGET, Pippin, Novartis, Janssen, Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Viking outside the submitted work. Dr Sanyal reported receiving grants from the NIDDK during the conduct of the study, and receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Conatus, Galectin, Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, Salix, and Sequana, serving as president of Sanyal Bio; having stock options in Akarna, Durect, Genfit, Indalo, and Tiziana; serving as a consultant to Ardelyx, Birdrock, Boehringer Ingelheim, ENYO, Exhalenz, GenFit, Hemoshear, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Nimbus, Nitto Denko, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Takeda, Terns, Surrozen, Siemens, Poxel, 89 Bio, and BASF; being an unpaid consultant to Affimmune, Albireo, Chemomab, Ecosens-Sandhill, Fractyl, Immuron, Intercept, and Zydus; and receiving royalties from Elsevier and UpToDate outside the submitted work; and having ongoing unpaid active research collaborations with AMRA, Perspectum, Antaros, Second Genome, and OWL. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram Showing Participants Evaluated and Included in the Study
FLINT indicates the Farnesoid X Receptor Ligand Obeticholic Acid in NASH Treatment Trial; PIVENS, Pioglitazone versus Vitamin E versus Placebo for the Treatment of Nondiabetic Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Trial; and NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. aThe total number of biopsies was 1059.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Examples of Progression and Regression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
Changes in diagnosis and fibrosis from first biopsy to last showing numbers of patients with changes of diagnosis (A) or fibrosis stage (B). Green boxes indicate improved diagnosis or regression of fibrosis; red boxes indicate worsening diagnosis or progression of fibrosis. White boxes indicate either no change in diagnosis or fibrosis stage or, in the case of off-diagonal boxes (B), a change in fibrosis that cannot be clearly defined as progression or regression. SH indicates steatohepatitis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Histologic Evolution of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
A-C, The proportion of patients with fibrosis stage 0, 1a, 1b, 1c, 2, 3, or 4 at first biopsy and last biopsy is shown in patients whose diagnosis improved, did not change, and worsened. A, For those with improvement in diagnosis, fibrosis stage is shown for those with diagnosis change from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) (n = 61), borderline to NAFL (n = 24), and NASH to borderline (n = 56). B, For patients with no change in diagnosis, fibrosis stage is shown for NAFL (n = 50) borderline (n = 21), and NASH (n = 159). C, For patients with worsening of diagnosis, fibrosis stage is shown for those with diagnosis change from NAFL to NASH (n = 18), borderline to NASH (n = 39), and NAFL to borderline (n = 18). D, The change in fibrosis stage from the first biopsy to the second is shown as a function of change in the NAFLD activity score (NAS). A reduction in the NAS was associated with a decrease in fibrosis stage, whereas an increase in the NAS was associated with an increase in fibrosis stage. Specifically, a 2-point or greater decrease in NAS was associated with fibrosis regression. One participant with a change in NAS of −7 and 1 participant with a change in NAS of +5 were removed from the figure. Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.38; slope, +0.67; SE, 0.08; P < .001. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

References

    1. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. . The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):-. doi:10.1002/hep.29367 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ekstedt M, Franzén LE, Mathiesen UL, et al. . Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006;44(4):865-873. doi:10.1002/hep.21327 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hagström H, Nasr P, Ekstedt M, et al. . Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD. J Hepatol. 2017;67(6):1265-1273. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams LA, Sanderson S, Lindor KD, Angulo P. The histological course of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a longitudinal study of 103 patients with sequential liver biopsies. J Hepatol. 2005;42(1):132-138. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2004.09.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McPherson S, Hardy T, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP, Anstee QM. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: implications for prognosis and clinical management. J Hepatol. 2015;62(5):1148-1155. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.034 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances