Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2019 Dec;43(12):2355-2360.
doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0466-1. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

Scientific discourse in the era of open science: a response to Hall et al. regarding the Carbohydrate-Insulin Model

Affiliations
Comment

Scientific discourse in the era of open science: a response to Hall et al. regarding the Carbohydrate-Insulin Model

David S Ludwig et al. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Dec.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DSL and CBE have conducted research studies examining the Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of obesity funded by the National Institutes of Health and philanthropic organizations unaffiliated with the food industry; DSL received royalties for books on obesity and nutrition that recommend a low-glycemic load diet. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
All panels involve data from our weight-loss-maintenance trial [2, 10], with the exception of c, which comes from Hall et al. [17]. a, b Correlation between TEE at baseline and outcome was stronger using the post-weight-loss versus pre-weight-loss timepoint (Meng’s Z-test, p = 0.003), demonstrating why choice of the post-weight-loss timepoint would be preferable. c “Unaccounted energy” in a metabolic ward study of “ultra-processed” foods [17] calculated from online data (deltabc.sas7bdat), with each participant studied on two diets for 2-week periods with DLW measurement of TEE and DXA measurement of body composition. “Unaccounted energy” (kcal/day) was calculated as energy intake (variable names: ProcAveEI, UnprocAveEI) – TEE (DLWEEProcessed, DLWEEUnproc) – change in stored energy per day (BCEBProcessed, BCEBUnproc). Only 15 of 37 observations were within ±250 kcal/day. d Analysis modeled after b in Hall et al. [9] of “unaccounted energy,” with sequential elimination of 40 (vs 81) individuals with low TEE relative to energy intake (vs low energy intake relative to TEE) in our intention-to-treat group. The observed diet effect inflates (vs deflates), demonstrating the bias introduced by postrandomization exclusion involving variables linked to the primary outcome. Because assumptions of linear regression were not satisfied (a problem that also applies to the corresponding figure in Hall et al. [9]), we used LOESS to visualize the relationship between threshold and ΔTEE. e Diet effect by tertiles of energy intake to TEE ratio in the Per Protocol group. Individual data indicated by circles. Mean (horizontal line) and 95% CIs (vertical bars) derived from a model adjusted for post-weight-loss TEE and other covariates (cohort, sex, age, percent weight loss, post-weight-loss weight). The difference in diet effect across the tertiles diminishes with adjustment, demonstrating the confounding present in raw data segregated by energy intake to TEE ratio. (This adjustment for baseline covariates would not remedy bias arising from postrandomization biological or measurement variation.)

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. George L. Blackburn Symposium to feature weight loss studies. News Release, The Obesity Society; 14 November 2018. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/11/14/1651612/0/en/Georg.... Accessed 9 Jul 2019.
    1. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Klein GL, Wong JMW, Bielak L, Steltz SK, et al. Effects of a low carbohydrate diet on energy expenditure during weight loss maintenance: randomized trial. BMJ. 2018;363:k4583.. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4583. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludwig DS, Ebbeling CB. The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity: beyond “calories in, calories out”. JAMA Int Med. 2018;178:1098–103. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2933. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall KD, Guo J. No significant effect of dietary carbohydrate versus fat on the reduction in total energy expenditure during maintenance of lost weight. BMJ Rapid Resp. 2018. https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4583/rr-16.
    1. Hall KD, Guo J, Chen KY, Leibel RL, Reitman ML, Rosenbaum M, et al. Methodologic considerations for measuring energy expenditure differences between diets varying in carbohydrate using the doubly labeled water method. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109:1328–34. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy390. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types