Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep-Dec;22(3):172-178.
doi: 10.1967/s002449911052. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

99mTc-MIBI scintimammography and digital mammography in the diagnosis of multicentric breast cancer

Affiliations
Free article

99mTc-MIBI scintimammography and digital mammography in the diagnosis of multicentric breast cancer

Sergey Nikolaevich Novikov et al. Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Sep-Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To compare diagnostic accuracy of scintimammography (SMG) and digital mammography (DS) in the diagnosis of multicentric breast cancer.

Subjects and methods: Three hundred and sixty seven women with histologically confirmed breast cancer were included in this analysis. All patients were candidates for conservative breast surgery and had cT1-3N0-1 stage of disease. Scintimammography was performed in prone position 5-10min after intravenous injection of 740MBq of technetium-99m-methoxy-isobtyl-isonitrile (99mTc-MIBI) with acquisition time of 10min for every lateral and anterior projection. Digital mammography was done in all women according to a standard clinical protocol. Final diagnosis was established by histopathology. Multicentric breast cancer was defined as 2 or more distinct invasive tumors located in more than one quadrant or additional lesions from the primary tumor of more than 4cm in size.

Results: According to histopathological examinations multicentric breast cancer was diagnosed in 47 of 367 (12.8%) patients. Scintimammography was more effective than mammography in detecting multicentric breast cancer: sensitivity: 83.0% vs 40.4% (P<0.001), specificity: 97.8% vs 95.3% (P=0.4), accuracy: 95.9% vs 88.3% (P<0.001), positive and negative predictive values: 84.8% vs 55.9% (P=0.004) and 97.5% vs 91.6% (P<0.001), respectively. Combination of DM and SMG was characterized by increased sensitivity (93.6%), worse specificity (93.4%), accuracy (93.4%) and worse predictive value (67.7%) as compared to only SMG.

Conclusion: Scintimammography was significantly much better by all statistical parameters than DM in the detection of multicentric breast cancer. High positive predictive value of scintimammography (84.8%) advocates it as a tool for surgery and radiotherapy planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances

LinkOut - more resources