Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Feb;26(2):197-205.
doi: 10.1111/tbj.13636. Epub 2019 Oct 6.

The clinical significance of metastatic breast carcinoma to intramammary lymph node

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The clinical significance of metastatic breast carcinoma to intramammary lymph node

Thaer Khoury et al. Breast J. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The incidence of involved intramammary lymph node (intra-MLN) with breast carcinoma (BC) is rare. Its clinical significance and impact on the clinical decision making is unclear. A total of 113 BC cases with at least one positive intra-MLN were collected from 11 academic institutions. The inclusion criteria were subsequent axillary lymph node dissection, and the availability of information on T-stage, size of node metastasis, extranodal extension status, biomarkers status, and clinical follow-up. Stage 4 cases and/or neo-adjuvant treated patients were excluded. AJCC TN-stage was calculated twice, with and without intra-MLN. Five-year overall survival (OS) and relapse (local and/or distant)-free survival (RFS) were calculated and correlated with the clinicopathologic variables. Excluding intra-MLN, TN-stage correlated with OS (P = .016) but not with RFS (P = .19). However, when intra-MLN was included, TN-stage correlated with both OS (P < .001) and RFS (P = .016). In the multivariate analysis, when intra-MLN was excluded, only radiation therapy (RT) correlated with RFS (HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.054-0.66, P = .009). However, when intra-MLN was included in the TN-stage both RT (HR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04-0.45, P = .001) and TN-stage 3 (HR = 8.92, 95% CI: 1.47-54, P = .017) correlated with RFS. Tumor multifocality was the only variable correlated with OS when the intra-MLN involvement was excluded. When intra-MLN was included, multifocality became insignificant but TN-stage 3 correlated with OS (HR = 8.59, 95% CI: 1.06-69.71, P = .044). Positive intra-MLN is an independent factor in predicting both RFS and OS.

Keywords: intramammary; lymph node; prognosis; sentinel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of authors have any conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Schematic figure showing the distribution of cases in relation to the status of ALND, ALN, and SLN. * A single intra-MLN was designated as SLN.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Schematic figure showing the distribution of cases in relation to the status of ALND, ALN, and SLN, excluding cases that did not meet the inclusion criteria for the clinical outcome studies.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Relapse free survival and overall survival; Relapse free survival, A, TN-stage 2 vs. TN-stage 3 excluding intra-MLN; B, : B, TN-stage 2 vs. TN-stage 3 including intra-MLN; C, ENE present vs. absent excluding intra-MLN; D, ENE present vs. absent including intra-MLN. Overall survival; E, TN-stage 2 vs. TN-stage 3 excluding intra-MLN; F, TN-stage 2 vs. TN-stage 3 including intra-MLN; G, ENE present vs. absent excluding intra-MLN; H, ENE present vs. absent including intra-MLN.

References

    1. Hortobagyi GN CJ, D’Orsi CJ, Edge AB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo LJ, Donald JS, Weaver DL, Winchester DJ, Giuliano A. Breast In: A MB, editor. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Switzerland: Springer; 2017. p. 589–628.
    1. Jadusingh IH. Intramammary lymph nodes. J Clin Pathol. 1992;45(11):1023–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kouskos E, Rovere GQ, Ball S, Koh DM, Freeman A. Metastatic intramammary lymph nodes as the primary presenting sign of breast cancer. Breast. 2004;13(5):416–20. - PubMed
    1. Pugliese MS, Stempel MM, Cody HS 3rd, Morrow M, Gemignani ML. Surgical management of the axilla: do intramammary nodes matter? American journal of surgery. 2009;198(4):532–7. - PubMed
    1. Shen J, Hunt KK, Mirza NQ, Krishnamurthy S, Singletary SE, Kuerer HM, et al. Intramammary lymph node metastases are an independent predictor of poor outcome in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101(6):1330–7. - PubMed

Publication types