Lung transplantation: a review of the optimal strategies for referral and patient selection
- PMID: 31588850
- PMCID: PMC6783657
- DOI: 10.1177/1753466619880078
Lung transplantation: a review of the optimal strategies for referral and patient selection
Abstract
One of the great challenges of lung transplantation is to bridge the dichotomy between supply and demand of donor organs so that the maximum number of potential recipients achieve a meaningful benefit in improvements in survival and quality of life. To achieve this laudable goal is predicated on choosing candidates who are sufficiently unwell, in fact possessing a terminal respiratory illness, but otherwise fit and able to undergo major surgery and a prolonged recuperation and rehabilitation stage combined with ongoing adherence to complex medical therapies. The choice of potential candidate and the timing of that referral is at times perhaps more art than science, but there are a number of solid guidelines for specific illnesses to assist the interested clinician. In this regard, the relationship between the referring clinician and the lung transplant unit is a critical one. It is an ongoing and dynamic process of education and two way communication, which is a marker of the professionalism of a highly performing unit. Lung transplantation is ultimately a team effort where the recipient is the key player. That principle has been enshrined in the three consensus position statements regarding selection criteria for lung and heart-lung transplantation promulgated by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation over the last two decades. During this period, the number of indications for lung transplantation have broadened and the number of contraindications reduced. Risk management is paramount in the pre- and perioperative period to effect early successful outcomes. While it is not the province of this review to reiterate the detailed listing of those factors, an overview position will be developed that describes the rationale and evidence for selected criteria where that exists. Importantly, the authors will attempt to provide an historical and experiential basis for making these important and life-determining decisions. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplementary material section.
Keywords: COPD; LAS; cystic fibrosis; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; lung transplantation; referral; selection.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Premortem Tumor Stress in Radioimmunotherapy.Trends Cancer. 2020 Mar;6(3):173-174. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 27. Trends Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32101719
References
-
- Maurer JR, Frost AE, Estenne M, et al. International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates. The international society for heart and lung transplantation, the American thoracic society, the American society of transplant physicians, the European respiratory society. Transplantation 1998; 66: 951–956. - PubMed
-
- Orens JB, Estenne M, Arcasoy S, et al. International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2006 update–a consensus report from the pulmonary scientific council of the international society for heart and lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25: 745–755. - PubMed
-
- Weill D, Benden C, Corris PA, et al. A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014–an update from the pulmonary transplantation council of the international society for heart and lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34: 1–15. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical