Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;21(2):83-91.
doi: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1670486. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input

Affiliations

Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input

Deepa Suneel et al. Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Self-reported hearing quality of life (QoL) for pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients was examined, asking whether 1) children with CIs have similar QoL as those with less severe hearing loss (HL); 2) children with different bilateral CI (BCI) device configurations report different QoL; and 3) do audiological, demographic and spoken language factors affect hearing QoL?Design: One hundred four children (ages 7-11 years) using bimodal devices or BCIs participated. The Hearing Environments and Reflection of Quality of Life (HEAR-QL) questionnaire, receptive language and speech perception tests were administered. HEAR-QL scores of CI recipients were compared to scores of age-mates with normal hearing and mild to profound HL.Results: HEAR-QL scores for CI participants were similar to those of children with less severe HL and did not differ with device configuration. Emotion identification and word recognition in noise correlated significantly with HEAR-QL scores.Discussion: CI recipients reported that HL hinders social participation. Better understanding of speech in noise and emotional content was associated with fewer hearing-related difficulties on the HEAR-QL.Conclusions: Noisy situations encountered in educational settings should be addressed for children with HL. The link between perception of emotion and hearing-related QoL for CI recipients should be further examined.

Keywords: Bilateral input; Cochlear implants; Hearing quality of life; Pediatric patients; Speech perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JL and DS report no relevant conflicts of interest related to this work. LSD is a member of the Knowledge Implementation in Pediatric Audiology (KIPA) group, Oticon.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Box-plots for HEAR-QL scores for the Activities, Environments, Feelings and Total Score for NH; Normal Hearing, UHL; Unilateral Hearing Loss, BHL; Bilateral Hearing Loss; BHL and CI; Cochlear Implant groups. The limits of the box represent the lower and upper quartile of the distribution and the horizontal line through the box represents the median. Whiskers represent the minimum and maximum scores in the distribution, excluding outliers. Open-circle outliers are values between 1.5 and 3 interquartile ranges (IQR) from the end of a box; asterisk outliers are values more than 3 IQRs from the end of a box. Significant differences (p<.019) between the CI group and the HL groups are shown above each plot.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Box-plots for the Total HEAR-QL scores for the Bimodal, Sequential and Simultaneous BCIs. The limits of the box represent the lower and upper quartile of the distribution and the horizontal line through the box represents the median. Open-circle outliers are values between 1.5 and 3 interquartile ranges from the end of a box.

References

    1. Archbold S, Sach T, O’neill C, Lutman M, & Gregory S (2008). Outcomes from cochlear implantation for child and family: parental perspectives. Deafness & Education International, 10(3), 120–142. doi:doi: 10.1002/dei.243 - DOI
    1. Bradlow AR, Torretta GM, & Pisoni DB (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20(3), 255–272. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chatterjee M, Zion DJ, Deroche ML, Burianek BA, Limb CJ, Goren AP, … Christensen JA (2015). Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers. Hearing Research, 322, 151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chmiel R, Sutton L, & Jenkins H (2000). Quality of life in children with cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology Supplement, 185, 103–105. - PubMed
    1. Cutting AL, & Dunn J (1999). Theory of Mind, Emotion Understanding, Language, and Family Background: Individual Differences and Interrelations. Child Development, 70(4), 853–865. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00061 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types