Pilot Study to Assess Safety and Usability of the Kyron NPWT System
- PMID: 31592014
- PMCID: PMC6756643
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002334
Pilot Study to Assess Safety and Usability of the Kyron NPWT System
Abstract
There is an evident need for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) systems specifically designed for use in resource-constrained settings to aid in the treatment of open wounds.
Methods: Prospective single-arm interventional pilot study of 14 patients with complex wounds was conducted at Kirtipur Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. A novel NPWT device, the Kyron Suction Unit, was used by 4 plastic surgeons. Primary outcomes were ease of use (10-point Likert scale) and device safety (adverse events recorded). Pain (Visual Analogue Scale score), quality of life (modified EuroQol Derived Single Index scores), and wound dimensions were recorded.
Results: User ratings on the 10-point Likert scale indicated high confidence and ease of use: median confidence setting up the device of 1.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.0; mean 2.3], median confidence maintaining the device of 1.0 (IQR, 1.0; mean, 1.5), and median ease of disassembly of 1.0 (IQR, 1.0; mean, 1.4). Significant improvement in Visual Analogue Scale scores (P = 0.03), modified EuroQol Derived Single Index scores (P < 0.001), and a reduction in wound volume [median, 47.25-9.75 cm3 (P = 0.01)]. Image analysis of wounds pretreatment and posttreatment demonstrated increase in granulation tissue surface area [median, 7.6-28.7 cm2 (P = 0.003)] and decrease in open wound surface area [median, 48.33-33.6 cm2 (P = 0.01)].
Conclusions: The Kyron Suction Unit was safe and easily managed by plastic surgeons. The device design promoted access to NPWT, a therapy proven to reduce healing time and decrease complications for patients with open wounds, in a resource-constrained setting.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):259-66. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182487a50. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012. PMID: 22552107 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of a portable, single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in home care patients with low to moderately exuding wounds: a case series.Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014 Mar;60(3):30-6. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014. PMID: 24610558
-
Open vs Closed Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Contaminated and Dirty Surgical Wounds: A Prospective Randomized Comparison.J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):507-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 21. J Am Coll Surg. 2018. PMID: 29274840 Clinical Trial.
-
EWMA Document: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.J Wound Care. 2017 Mar 1;26(Sup3):S1-S154. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup3.S1. J Wound Care. 2017. PMID: 28345371 Review.
-
Negative pressure wound therapy in orthopaedic surgery.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Feb;103(1S):S99-S103. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.04.018. Epub 2016 Dec 30. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 28043851 Review.
References
-
- Blueweave Consulting & Research Pvt Ltd. Global Wound Care Market by Product, by Wound Type, by Application, by End User-Size, Share, Development, Growth and Demand Forecast, 2018-2024.
-
- Kanakaris NK, Thanasas C, Keramaris N, et al. The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of lower extremity trauma: review of clinical evidence. Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 5):S9–S18. - PubMed
-
- Krug E, Berg L, Lee C, et al. ; International Expert Panel on Negative Pressure Wound Therapy [NPWT-EP]. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in traumatic wounds and reconstructive surgery: steps towards an international consensus. Injury. 2011;42(Suppl 1):S1–S12. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources