Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;31(1):22-31.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001110.

Record Linkage Approaches Using Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and Mortality Data for Public Health Analyses and Epidemiologic Studies

Affiliations

Record Linkage Approaches Using Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and Mortality Data for Public Health Analyses and Epidemiologic Studies

Sarah Nechuta et al. Epidemiology. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data has greatly increased in recent years as these data have accumulated as part of the response to the opioid epidemic in the United States. We evaluated the accuracy of record linkage approaches using the Controlled Substance Monitoring Database (Tennessee's [TN] PDMP, 2012-2016) and mortality data on all drug overdose decedents in Tennessee (2013-2016).

Methods: We compared total, missed, and false positive (FP) matches (with manual verification of all FPs) across approaches that included a variety of data cleaning and matching methods (probabilistic/fuzzy vs. deterministic) for patient and death linkages, and prescription history. We evaluated the influence of linkage approaches on key prescription measures used in public health analyses. We evaluated characteristics (e.g., age, education, sex) of missed matches and incorrect matches to consider potential bias.

Results: The most accurate probabilistic/fuzzy matching approach identified 4,714 overdose deaths (vs. the deterministic approach, n = 4,572), with a low FP linkage error (<1%) and high correct match proportion (95% vs. 92% and ~90% for probabilistic approaches not using comprehensive data cleaning). Estimation of all prescription measures improved (vs. deterministic approach). For example, frequency (%) of decedents filling an oxycodone prescription in the last 60 days (n = 1,371 [32%] vs. n = 1,443 [33%]). Missed overdose decedents were more likely to be younger, male, nonwhite, and of higher education.

Conclusion: Implications of study findings include underreporting, prescribing and outcome misclassification, and reduced generalizability to population risk groups, information of importance to epidemiologists and researchers using PDMP data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Study Data Sources, Study Population, and Entity Resolution/Record Linkage Methods
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Identification of FP Matches for Manual Review for Four Fuzzy/Probabilistic Record Linkage Approaches aSee Table 1 for approach descriptions. bResults from manual review are summarized in Table 2.

References

    1. Meldrum ML. The ongoing opioid prescription epidemic: historical context. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:1365–1366. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dasgupta N, Beletsky L, Ciccarone D. Opioid crisis: no easy fix to its social and economic determinants. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:182–186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Training and Technical Assistance Center. http://www.pdmpassist.org/pdf/PDMP_Program_Status_20170824.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2018.
    1. Lin DH, Lucas E, Murimi IB, et al. Physician attitudes and experiences with Maryland’s prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP). Addiction. 2017;112:311–319. - PubMed
    1. McCauley JL, Leite RS, Gordan VV, et al. ; National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Opioid prescribing and risk mitigation implementation in the management of acute pain: results from the national dental practice-based research network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149:353–362. - PMC - PubMed

Substances