Standardization of Reading Charts: A Review of Recent Developments
- PMID: 31592960
- DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001436
Standardization of Reading Charts: A Review of Recent Developments
Abstract
This review gives an overview of the current status of standardization by statistical evaluation of reading charts. First begun only 20 years ago, the statistical evaluation of reading charts now reflects an increasing clinical and scientific interest in standardized, comparable, and reproducible reading charts.For clinical or research purposes in human subjects, standardization of psychophysical tests and their test items by statistical evaluation is mandatory because it provides experimental control. Initial attempts at reading chart standardization were made by characterizing the test items, either in terms of a selection of unrelated words or in terms of sentences representing a constant number of characters, including spaces. As initiated by the RADNER Reading Charts, standardization of reading charts (and test items) by statistical evaluation has gained increasing clinical and scientific interest in the last two decades and has later also been applied to some of the other modern reading charts. A literature search was performed with respect to reading charts that (a) have been produced in accordance with the recommendations of the International Council of Ophthalmology (geometrical print size progression), (b) have been statistically analyzed, and/or (c) use clearly characterized test items (conceptually and statistically). These reading charts are as follows: the Bailey-Lovie Word Reading Charts, the Colenbrander Cards, the RADNER Reading Charts, the MNREAD Acuity Charts, the Smith-Kettlewell Reading Test (SKread Test), the C-Read Charts, and the Balsam Alabdulkader-Leat (BAL) Chart. The test items of these charts have been characterized either empirically or by statistical analysis and selection. The extent of the statistical evaluation of the reading charts varies. Despite their different methodological approaches, these reading charts represent an advancement that has made possible the useful comparison and reproducible evaluation of near visual performance.
Similar articles
-
Reading charts in ophthalmology.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;255(8):1465-1482. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3659-0. Epub 2017 Apr 14. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28411305 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Standardized Arabic Reading Acuity Chart: The Balsam Alabdulkader-Leat Chart.Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Aug;94(8):807-816. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001103. Optom Vis Sci. 2017. PMID: 28737607
-
[Ophthalmologic reading charts : Part 2: Current logarithmically scaled reading charts].Ophthalmologe. 2016 Dec;113(12):1029-1035. doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-0175-7. Ophthalmologe. 2016. PMID: 26586550 Review. German.
-
Near vision examination in presbyopia patients: Do we need good homologated near vision charts?Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Nov 10;3:29. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0061-7. eCollection 2016. Eye Vis (Lond). 2016. PMID: 27844022 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of reading performance tests concerning difficulty of sentences and paragraphs and their reliability.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 May;35(3):324-35. doi: 10.1111/opo.12204. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015. PMID: 25913875
Cited by
-
Using the C-Read as a Portable Device to Evaluate Reading Ability in Young Chinese Adults: An Observational Study.J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):463. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030463. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 36983645 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of reading tests.Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 18;16(1):121-127. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.01.18. eCollection 2023. Int J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36659955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study.Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 Aug 15;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5. Eye Vis (Lond). 2022. PMID: 35965343 Free PMC article.
-
Further Validation of Comfortable Print Size as a Parameter for Clinical Low-Vision Assessment.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Jun 1;12(6):18. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.6.18. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 37358493 Free PMC article.
-
Font effects on reading parameters: comparing Radner Reading Charts printed in Helvetica and Times Roman.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;260(10):3387-3394. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05665-y. Epub 2022 Apr 26. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35471739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials