Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;62(3):377-390.
doi: 10.1177/0018720819879271. Epub 2019 Oct 8.

Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room

Affiliations

Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room

Jackie S Cha et al. Hum Factors. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify potential needs and barriers related to using exoskeletons to decrease musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms for workers in the operating room (OR).

Background: MS symptoms and injuries adversely impact worker health and performance in surgical environments. Half of the surgical team members (e.g., surgeons, nurses, trainees) report MS symptoms during and after surgery. Although the ergonomic risks in surgery are well recognized, little has been done to develop and sustain effective interventions.

Method: Surgical team members (n = 14) participated in focus groups, performed a 10-min simulated surgical task with a commercial upper-body exoskeleton, and then completed a usability questionnaire. Content analysis was conducted to determine relevant themes.

Results: Four themes were identified: (1) characteristics of individuals, (2) perceived benefits, (3) environmental/societal factors, and (4) intervention characteristics. Participants noted that exoskeletons would benefit workers who stand in prolonged, static postures (e.g., holding instruments for visualization) and indicated that they could foresee a long-term decrease in MS symptoms with the intervention. Specifically, raising awareness of exoskeletons for early-career workers and obtaining buy-in from team members may increase future adoption of this technology. Mean participant responses from the System Usability Scale was 81.3 out of 100 (SD = 8.1), which was in the acceptable range of usability.

Conclusion: Adoption factors were identified to implement exoskeletons in the OR, such as the indicated need for exoskeletons and usability. Exoskeletons may be beneficial in the OR, but barriers such as maintenance and safety to adoption will need to be addressed.

Application: Findings from this work identify facilitators and barriers for sustained implementation of exoskeletons by surgical teams.

Keywords: industrial/workplace ergonomics; interventions; qualitative methods; surgical care and procedural technologies; usability testing and evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Exoskeleton equipment was worn while performing the FLS task, and (b) inside-the-box view of the FLS task. FLS = Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery.

References

    1. Albayrak A, van Veelen MA, Prins JF, Snijders CJ, de Ridder H, & Kazemier G (2007). A newly designed ergonomic body support for surgeons. Surgical Endoscopy, 21, 1835–1840. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9249-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alleblas CC, De Man AM, Van Den Haak L, Vierhout ME, Jansen FW, & Nieboer TE (2017). Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: A systematic review. Annals of Surgery, 266, 905–920. - PubMed
    1. Bangor A, Kortum P, & Miller J (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4, 114–123.
    1. Berquer R, Smith WD, & Davis S (2002). An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 16, 416–421. - PubMed
    1. Bosch T, van Eck J, Knitel K, & de Looze M (2016). The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Applied Ergonomics, 54, 212–217. - PubMed

Publication types