Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 9;21(10):e13263.
doi: 10.2196/13263.

Barriers to the Use of Mobile Health in Improving Health Outcomes in Developing Countries: Systematic Review

Clemens Kruse #  1 , Jose Betancourt  1 , Stephanie Ortiz  1 , Susana Melissa Valdes Luna  1 , Inderdeep Kaur Bamrah  1 , Narce Segovia  1
Affiliations

Barriers to the Use of Mobile Health in Improving Health Outcomes in Developing Countries: Systematic Review

Clemens Kruse et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies to improve population-level health outcomes around the world has surged in the last decade. Research supports the use of mHealth apps to improve health outcomes such as maternal and infant mortality, treatment adherence, immunization rates, and prevention of communicable diseases. However, developing countries face significant barriers to successfully implement, sustain, and expand mHealth initiatives to improve the health of vulnerable populations.

Objective: We aimed to identify and synthesize barriers to the use of mHealth technologies such as text messaging (short message service [SMS]), calls, and apps to change and, where possible, improve the health behaviors and health outcomes of populations in developing countries.

Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Deriving search criteria from the review's primary objective, we searched PubMed and CINAHL using an exhaustive terms search (eg, mHealth, text messaging, and developing countries, with their respective Medical Subject Headings) limited by publication date, English language, and full text. At least two authors thoroughly reviewed each article's abstract to verify the articles were germane to our objective. We then applied filters and conducted consensus meetings to confirm that the articles met the study criteria.

Results: Review of 2224 studies resulted in a final group of 30 articles for analysis. mHealth initiatives were used extensively worldwide for applications such as maternal health, prenatal care, infant care, HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment adherence, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and health education. Studies were conducted in several developing countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. From each article, we recorded the specific health outcome that was improved, mHealth technology used, and barriers to the successful implementation of the intervention in a developing country. The most prominent health outcomes improved with mHealth were infectious diseases and maternal health, accounting for a combined 20/30 (67%) of the total studies in the analysis. The most frequent mHealth technology used was SMS, accounting for 18/30 (60%) of the studies. We identified 73 individual barriers and grouped them into 14 main categories. The top 3 barrier categories were infrastructure, lack of equipment, and technology gap, which together accounted for 28 individual barriers.

Conclusions: This systematic review shed light on the most prominent health outcomes that can be improved using mHealth technology interventions in developing countries. The barriers identified will provide leaders of future intervention projects a solid foundation for their design, thus increasing the chances for long-term success. We suggest that, to overcome the top three barriers, project leaders who wish to implement mHealth interventions must establish partnerships with local governments and nongovernmental organizations to secure funding, leadership, and the required infrastructure.

Keywords: communication barriers; developing countries; health outcomes; telemedicine; text messaging; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

None
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of the literature search and selection process.
None
Location of studies of mobile health technologies to improve preventive health outcomes in developing countries, by region.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pillay Y, Motsoaledi PA. Digital health in South Africa: innovating to improve health. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 2):e000722. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000722. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29713513 bmjgh-2018-000722 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seebregts C, Fogwill T, Tanna G, Barron P, Benjamin P. MomConnect: an exemplar implementation of the health normative standards framework in South Africa. South Afr Health Rev. 2016 Jan 01;2016(1):125–135. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC189313
    1. McBride B, Nguyen LT, Wiljer D, Vu NC, Nguyen CK, O'Neil J. Development of a maternal, newborn and child mHealth intervention in Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam: protocol for the mMom Project. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jan 11;7(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7912. https://www.researchprotocols.org/2018/1/e6/ v7i1e6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Odetola TD, Ayamolowo LB, Ayamolowo SJ. Childbearing women's perception about the use of mHealth for maternal health information in rural communities, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. J Int Soc Telemed eHealth. 2018 May 08;6(1):9–1. doi: 10.29086/JISfTeH.6.e9. https://journals.ukzn.ac.za/index.php/JISfTeH/article/view/531 - DOI
    1. Kay M, Santos J, Takane M. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies. Global Observatory for eHealth series. Volume 3. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011. [2019-08-16]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44607/9789241564250_eng... .

Publication types

MeSH terms