Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e031185.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031185.

Online survey to assess parents' experience and preferences for follow-up visits for children living with type 1 diabetes in Quebec, Canada: a study protocol

Affiliations

Online survey to assess parents' experience and preferences for follow-up visits for children living with type 1 diabetes in Quebec, Canada: a study protocol

Maude Laberge et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: It is accepted that although patients may initiate a visit to a healthcare provider, follow-up visits are often based on recommendations from providers. This suggests that follow-up care, since not initiated by patients, may not reflect patients' perception of a need for care. However, few studies have examined the burden of regular follow-up care and patients' perceived value of such care. For parents of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), follow-up visits are scheduled regardless of how well controlled the diabetes is. Our study examines how benefits and burden from the parents' perspective could affect their preferences in regard to the frequency of regular follow-up care.

Methods: We aim to develop an online patient survey to be distributed to parents of children living with T1D in the province of Quebec, Canada. The survey will be available in French and English, and distributed through diabetes clinics, on social media groups and forums for parents of children with T1D. The survey will be developed in collaboration with parents of children with T1D to ensure that it appropriately reflects the services in regular follow-up care and that the language is understandable and clear.

Ethics and dissemination: All participants will be informed of the requirements and objectives of the survey at the beginning of the questionnaire and that the data collected will remain anonymous and confidential. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the research ethics committee of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval. Results of the study will be shared with relevant stakeholders with the aim of improving practices and better meeting patients' and families' needs.

Keywords: disease burden; paediatric diabetes; patient preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rice TH, Labelle RJ. Do physicians induce demand for medical services? J Health Polit Policy Law 1989;14:587–600. 10.1215/03616878-14-3-587 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wennberg JE. On patient need, equity, supplier-induced demand, and the need to assess the outcome of common medical practices. Med Care 1985;23:512. - PubMed
    1. Jacobson MG, Chang TY, Earle CC, et al. . Physician agency and patient survival. J Econ Behav Organ 2017;134:27–47. 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.11.011 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandjour A. Patient preferences: a Trojan horse for evidence-based medicine? Eur J Health Econ 2018;19:167–72. 10.1007/s10198-017-0916-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cutler D, Skinner JS, Stern AD, et al. . Physician beliefs and patient preferences: a new look at regional variation in health care spending. Am Econ J Econ Policy 2019;11:192–221. 10.1257/pol.20150421 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms