Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;14(1):55-64.
doi: 10.1177/1932296819877194. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: The Value of Using Microclimate Sensor Arrays

Affiliations

Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: The Value of Using Microclimate Sensor Arrays

Petra Jones et al. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Accurately predicting the risk of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) could dramatically reduce the enormous burden of chronic wound management and amputation. Yet, the current prognostic models are unable to precisely predict DFU events. Typically, efforts have focused on individual factors like temperature, pressure, or shear rather than the overall foot microclimate.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed reports with no restrictions on start date covering the literature published until February 20, 2019 using relevant keywords, including temperature, pressure, shear, and relative humidity. We review the use of these variables as predictors of DFU, highlighting gaps in our current understanding and suggesting which specific features should be combined to develop a real-time microclimate prognostic model.

Results: The current prognostic models rely either solely on contralateral temperature, pressure, or shear measurement; these parameters, however, rarely reach 50% specificity in relation to DFU. There is also considerable variation in methodological investigation, anatomical sensor configuration, and resting time prior to temperature measurements (5-20 minutes). Few studies have considered relative humidity and mean skin resistance.

Conclusion: Very limited evidence supports the use of single clinical parameters in predicting the risk of DFU. We suggest that the microclimate as a whole should be considered to predict DFU more effectively and suggest nine specific features which appear to be implicated for further investigation. Technology supports real-time in-shoe data collection and wireless transmission, providing a potentially rich source of data to better predict the risk of DFU.

Keywords: foot; microclimate; neuropathy; sensors; ulcer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The microclimate.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Microclimate review methodology.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kerr M. Improving foot care for people with diabetes and saving money: an economic study in England 2017. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/professionals/resources/shared-practice/foot.... Accessed May 7, 2019.
    1. Clayton W, Elasy TA. A review of the pathophysiology, classification, and treatment of foot ulcers in diabetic patients. Clin Diabetes. 2009;27(2):52-58.
    1. Mishra SC, Chhatbar KC, Kashikar A, Mehndiratta A. Diabetic foot. BMJ. 2017;359:j5064. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunt DL. Diabetes: foot ulcers and amputations. BMJ Clin Evid. 2009;0602 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907821/ - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reiber GE, Vileikyte L, Boyko EJ, et al. Causal pathways for incident lower extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes from two settings. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(1):157-162. - PubMed

Publication types