Host DNA replication forks are not preferred targets for bacteriophage Mu transposition
- PMID: 3159718
- PMCID: PMC219110
- DOI: 10.1128/jb.163.1.282-290.1985
Host DNA replication forks are not preferred targets for bacteriophage Mu transposition
Abstract
Bacteriophage Mu DNA integration in Escherichia coli strains infected after alignment of chromosomal replication was analyzed by a sandwich hybridization assay. The results indicated that Mu integrated into chromosomal segments at various distances from oriC with similar kinetics. In an extension of these studies, various Hfr strains were infected after alignment of chromosomal replication, and Mu transposition was shut down early after infection. The positions of integrated Mu copies were inferred from the transfer kinetics of Mu to an F- strain. Our analysis indicated that the location of Mu DNA in the host chromosome was not dependent on the positions of host replication forks at the time of infection. However, the procedure for aligning chromosomal replication affected DNA transfer by various Hfr strains differently, and this effect could account for prior results suggesting preferential integration of Mu at host replication forks.
Similar articles
-
Replication forks of Escherichia coli are not the preferred sites for lysogenic integration of bacteriophage Mu.J Bacteriol. 1988 Jul;170(7):3089-93. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.7.3089-3093.1988. J Bacteriol. 1988. PMID: 2968339 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of bacteriophage Mu at host chromosomal replication forks during lytic development.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 May;77(5):2801-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2801. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980. PMID: 6446718 Free PMC article.
-
[Participation of plasmid F in the replication of the chromosome of an Hfr strain of Escherichia coli K-12].Genetika. 1983 Mar;19(3):416-24. Genetika. 1983. PMID: 6343185 Russian.
-
[Transposition as a way of existence: phage Mu].Genetika. 2003 May;39(5):637-56. Genetika. 2003. PMID: 12838611 Review. Russian.
-
Application of the bacteriophage Mu-driven system for the integration/amplification of target genes in the chromosomes of engineered Gram-negative bacteria--mini review.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Aug;91(4):857-71. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3416-y. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011. PMID: 21698377 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Repair of transposable phage Mu DNA insertions begins only when the E. coli replisome collides with the transpososome.Mol Microbiol. 2015 Aug;97(4):746-58. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13061. Epub 2015 Jun 6. Mol Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 25983038 Free PMC article.
-
Replication forks of Escherichia coli are not the preferred sites for lysogenic integration of bacteriophage Mu.J Bacteriol. 1988 Jul;170(7):3089-93. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.7.3089-3093.1988. J Bacteriol. 1988. PMID: 2968339 Free PMC article.
-
The Mu story: how a maverick phage moved the field forward.Mob DNA. 2012 Dec 5;3(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1759-8753-3-21. Mob DNA. 2012. PMID: 23217166 Free PMC article.
-
Mu insertions are repaired by the double-strand break repair pathway of Escherichia coli.PLoS Genet. 2012;8(4):e1002642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002642. Epub 2012 Apr 12. PLoS Genet. 2012. PMID: 22511883 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials