Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Dec;46(4):297-310.
doi: 10.1177/1465312519880558. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

What evidence exists for myofunctional therapy with prefabricated appliances? A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials

Spyridon N Papageorgiou  1 , Despina Koletsi  1 , Theodore Eliades  1
Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

What evidence exists for myofunctional therapy with prefabricated appliances? A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials

Spyridon N Papageorgiou et al. J Orthod. 2019 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To assess the treatment efficacy/efficiency with prefabricated myofunctional appliances (PMA) for children with malocclusion.

Data sources: Nine databases searched without limitations till July 2019.

Data selection: Randomised trials comparing PMAs to functional appliance treatment or no treatment.

Data extraction: Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were done in duplicate.

Data synthesis: Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) or relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted on seven publications (three published and one unpublished trials; 232 patients; 53% male; mean age 10.2 years). Compared to no treatment, one trial indicated that PMAs were somewhat effective in reducing overjet (MD -2.4; 95% CI -3.3 to -1.5), reducing overbite (MD -2.5; 95% CI -3.2 to -1.8), reducing mandibular crowding (RR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.8) and establishing Class I canine relationship (RR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.9). However, compared to custom-made functional appliances, three trials indicated that PMAs were less effective in reducing the ANB angle (MD 0.9; 95% CI 0.5-1.4), increasing mandibular ramus length (MD -2.2; 95% CI -2.9 to -1.51), reducing overjet (MD 1.5; 95% CI 0.9-2.1), establishing a solid Class I molar relationship (RR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.7), reducing the nasolabial angle (MD 5.8; 95% CI 0.8-10.8) and reducing facial convexity (MD -2.6; 95% CI -4.3 to -0.9). Finally, the quality of evidence was moderate to low due to risk of bias.

Conclusions: PMAs are more effective in reducing overjet, overbite, mandibular crowding and establishing Class I canine relationship than no treatment. However, compared to custom-made functional appliances, PMAs are less effective in producing dental, skeletal or soft-tissue changes, even though they are less costly.

Keywords: Class II malocclusion; evidence-based medicine; functional appliance; malocclusion; meta-analysis; myofunctional therapy; randomised trial; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer