Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 9;9(1):14479.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51128-6.

Universal HIV and Birth Cohort HCV Screening in San Diego Emergency Departments

Affiliations

Universal HIV and Birth Cohort HCV Screening in San Diego Emergency Departments

Martin Hoenigl et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Universal HIV and HCV screening in emergency departments (ED) can reach populations who are less likely to get tested otherwise. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate universal opt-out HIV and HCV screening in two EDs in San Diego. HIV screening for persons aged 13-64 years (excluding persons known to be HIV+ or reporting HIV testing within last 12 months) was implemented using a 4th generation HIV antigen/antibody assay; HCV screening was offered to persons born between 1945 and 1965. Over a period of 16 months, 12,575 individuals were tested for HIV, resulting in 33 (0.26%) new HIV diagnoses, of whom 30 (90%) were successfully linked to care. Universal screening also identified 74 out-of-care for >12-months HIV+ individuals of whom 50 (68%) were successfully relinked to care. Over a one-month period, HCV antibody tests were conducted in 905 individuals with a seropositivity rate of 9.9% (90/905); 61 seropositives who were newly identified or never treated for HCV had HCV RNA testing, of which 31 (51%) resulted positive (3.4% of all participants, including 18 newly identified RNA positives representing 2% of all participants), and 13/31 individuals (42%) were linked to care. The rate of newly diagnosed HCV infections exceeded the rate of newly diagnosed HIV infections by >7-fold, underlining the importance of HCV screening in EDs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of testing algorithm (blue) and Case Management flow (brown). New HIV positives were identified only via testing, while known HIV positives were identified via testing and also question 1 of the automated EMR algorithm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of HIV tests per week (number of tests Y-axis, week on X-axis) in the two participating Emergency Departments. Blue rectangle indicates the time period the HCV pilot was conducted. Arrow indicates the time when the opting-out discussion was moved from the nursing triage to the blood draw.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010–2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report, http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html, 23 (2018).
    1. Branson BM, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations & Reports. 2006;55(RR14):1–17. - PubMed
    1. Martin, T. C. S. et al. Genetic network analysis to assess the risk of HIV transmission among MSM seeking partners on the Internet. Clin Infect Dis., 10.1093/cid/ciz278, [Epub ahead of print] 2019 Apr 6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoenigl M, et al. Repeat HIV-testing is associated with an increase in behavioral risk among men who have sex with men: a cohort study. BMC Med. 2015;13:218-015-0458-5. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0458-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoenigl M, Chaillon A, Morris SR, Little SJ. HIV Infection Rates and Risk Behavior among Young Men undergoing community-based Testing in San Diego. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25927. doi: 10.1038/srep25927. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types