Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct;60(10):1051-1056.

Achieving humane outcomes in killing livestock by free bullet II: Target selection

Affiliations
Review

Achieving humane outcomes in killing livestock by free bullet II: Target selection

Dennis D Will et al. Can Vet J. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Killing infected or surplus-to-market livestock by free bullet is unavoidable in Foreign Animal Disease response in countries exporting large numbers of live animals. Correct targeting and placement of free bullet projectiles result in immediate death, thereby making this method acceptable for humane animal killing. Regulatory veterinarians will be responsible for animal welfare in overseeing emergency killing of livestock by free bullet. To assure humane fatal penetrating brain injury under field conditions, veterinarians as operational experts, need to fully understand the anatomy of all farmed animals and the pathophysiology of the terminal ballistics of weapon systems to make appropriate, on the ground decisions, in emergency situations.

Atteinte de résultats humanitaires lors de l’abattage de bovins par balles de fusil II : Sélection de la cible. L’abattage par balles de fusil de bovins infectés ou en excès pour le marché est inévitable lors de la réponse à l’apparition d’une maladie exotique dans les pays exportant de grandes quantités d’animaux vivants. La mise-enjoue et le placement appropriés de balles de fusil résultent en mort immédiate, rendant ainsi cette méthode acceptable pour l’abattage humanitaire d’animaux. Les vétérinaires d’agences réglementaires seront responsables du bien-être animal en supervisant l’abattage d’urgence par balles des bovins. Afin d’assurer une blessure cérébrale pénétrante fatale dans des conditions de terrain, en tant qu’experts opérationnels, les vétérinaires doivent comprendre à fond l’anatomie de tous les animaux de la ferme et la pathophysiologie de la balistique terminale des armes afin de prendre les décisions appropriées sur le terrain lors de situations d’urgence.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lateral sagittal projection of a generic ruminant skull. a — Perfect shot terminal trajectory with a controlled expanding low energy projectile that comes to rest in the foramen magnum. b — With the energy transfer and penetration limitations of the captive bolt replaced with free missile the target area is significantly larger while retaining the target of the trans-brain penetration with the foramen magnum as the target (shaded oval).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visualizing the line of sight to the mid-brain for free bullet humane killing. Free ranging beef cattle approaching the photographer across a 3-strand barb wire fence. Bos domesticus has small ears and high ear carriage; the lower point of ear-skull attachment is the primary landmark allowing for correct targeting of the brainstem with the angle of incidence of the projectile lower than 90°. Muzzle to target distance 5 to 7 m. Midbrain lies adjacent to the lateral meatus of the ear in all livestock.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Considerations in planning or reviewing use of free bullet weapon systems in humane killing of livestock under emergency conditions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarabi B. Surgical outcome in 435 patients who sustained missile head wounds during the Iran-Iraq War. Neurosurgery. 1990;27:692–695. - PubMed
    1. Aarabi B, Tofighi B, Kufera JA, et al. Predictors of outcome in civilian gunshot wounds to the head. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:1138–1146. - PubMed
    1. Falland-Cheung L, Waddell JN, Chun Li K, Tong D, Brunton P. Investigation of the elastic modulus, tensile and flexural strength of five skull simulant materials for impact testing of a forensic skin/skull/brain model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;68:303–307. - PubMed
    1. Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M. Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nature Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:128–142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anonomous. A Survey of the Extent of Compliance with the Requirements of the Code of Practice for the Humane Shooting of Kangaroos. Deakin ACT, Australia: RSPCA Australia; 2002.

LinkOut - more resources