Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):330-340.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz175.

Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review

Saba Akbar  1 , Enrico Coiera  1 , Farah Magrabi  1
Affiliations

Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review

Saba Akbar et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the research literature about safety concerns with consumer-facing health apps and their consequences.

Materials and methods: We searched bibliographic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane libraries from January 2013 to May 2019 for articles about health apps. Descriptive information about safety concerns and consequences were extracted and classified into natural categories. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) statement.

Results: Of the 74 studies identified, the majority were reviews of a single or a group of similar apps (n = 66, 89%), nearly half related to disease management (n = 34, 46%). A total of 80 safety concerns were identified, 67 related to the quality of information presented including incorrect or incomplete information, variation in content, and incorrect or inappropriate response to consumer needs. The remaining 13 related to app functionality including gaps in features, lack of validation for user input, delayed processing, failure to respond to health dangers, and faulty alarms. Of the 52 reports of actual or potential consequences, 5 had potential for patient harm. We also identified 66 reports about gaps in app development, including the lack of expert involvement, poor evidence base, and poor validation.

Conclusions: Safety of apps is an emerging public health issue. The available evidence shows that apps pose clinical risks to consumers. Involvement of consumers, regulators, and healthcare professionals in development and testing can improve quality. Additionally, mandatory reporting of safety concerns is needed to improve outcomes.

Keywords: consumer health information; mHealth; mobile applications; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Article search and retrieval process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Joshi A, Generalla J, Thompson B, Haidet P.. Facilitating the feedback process on a clinical clerkship using a smartphone application. Acad Psychiatry 2017; 41 (5): 651–5. - PubMed
    1. Wicks P, Chiauzzi E.. Trust but verify'–five approaches to ensure safe medical apps. BMC Med 2015; 13: 205.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boulos MN, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, Buller DB, Dellavalle RP.. Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J Public Health Inform 2014; 5 (3): 229. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peng W, Kanthawala S, Yuan S, Hussain SA.. A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps. BMC Public Health 2016; 16 (1): 1158. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pellegrini CA, Duncan JM, Moller AC, Buscemi J, Sularz A, DeMott A.. A smartphone-supported weight loss program: design of the ENGAGED randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2012; 12 (1): 1041.. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types