Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;82(2):87-93.
doi: 10.1111/cod.13414. Epub 2019 Nov 17.

The methylisothiazolinone epidemic goes along with changing patients' characteristics - After cosmetics, industrial applications are the focus

Axel Schnuch  1 , Steffen Schubert  1 , Holger Lessmann  1 , Johannes Geier  1 ; IVDK
Collaborators, Affiliations

The methylisothiazolinone epidemic goes along with changing patients' characteristics - After cosmetics, industrial applications are the focus

Axel Schnuch et al. Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Sensitization to methylisothiazolinone (MI) has seen an exceptional epidemic, mainly attributed to its use in cosmetics.

Objectives: To trace the epidemic of MI allergy (2009-2018), and to analyze a possible change of patients' characteristics.

Methods: Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken-data of patients patch tested between 2009 and 2018 with MI (0.05% aq.) were analyzed concerning anamnestic items and sensitization frequencies.

Results: Overall, 4.9% reacted positive to MI. Comparing sensitization to MI in three periods (2009, 2013/14, and 2017/18), there was an increase to 7% in 2013 and a decrease to 3.4% in 2018. The MOAHLFA Index (M=Men, O=Occupational Dermatitis, A=Atopic Dermatitis, L=Leg Dermatitis, F=Face Dermatitis, A= Age > 40) for the period 2013/14 is characterized by a lower proportion of occupational dermatitis and a higher proportion of face dermatitis. The period 2017/18 is characterized by increases of occupational dermatitis and hand dermatitis, and a decrease of face dermatitis. Painters, personal care workers, and hairdressers were particularly affected. Sensitization in hairdressers and personal care workers (mostly cosmeticians) decreased after the peak in 2013/14, whereas sensitization to MI in painters continued to increase.

Conclusions: After an unprecedented epidemic of MI allergy, mainly caused by its use in cosmetics, the continuous use of MI in industrial applications, for example, paints, and subsequent sensitization remain a matter of concern.

Keywords: CAS no. 2682-20-4; clinical epidemiology; contact sensitization; face dermatitis; methylisothiazolinone; occupational dermatitis; patch testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Uter W. Recent increase in allergic reactions to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: is methylisothiazolinone the culprit? Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67:334-341.
    1. Herman A, Aerts O, de Montjoye L, Tromme I, Goossens A, Baeck M. Isothiazolinone derivatives and allergic contact dermatitis: a review and update. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:267-276.
    1. Uter W, Amario-Hita JC, Balato A, et al. European surveillance system on contact allergies (ESSCA): results with the European baseline series, 2013/14. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:1516-1525.
    1. Zirwas MJ, Hamann D, Warshaw EM, et al. Epidemic of isothiazolinone allergy in North America: prevalence data from the north American contact dermatitis group, 2013-2014. Dermatitis. 2017;28:204-209.
    1. DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Zug KA, et al. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2015-2016. Dermatitis. 2018;29:297-309.

LinkOut - more resources