Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2019 Oct:41 Suppl 1:1-15.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12898.

Understanding digital health: Productive tensions at the intersection of sociology of health and science and technology studies

Affiliations
Editorial

Understanding digital health: Productive tensions at the intersection of sociology of health and science and technology studies

Flis Henwood et al. Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

In this editorial introduction, we explore how digital health is being explored at the intersection of sociology of health and science and technology studies (STS). We suggest that socio-material approaches and practice theories provide a shared space within which productive tensions between sociology of health and STS can continue. These tensions emerge around the long-standing challenges of avoiding technological determinism while maintaining a clear focus on the materiality and agency of technologies and recognising enduring sets of relations that emerge in new digital health practices while avoiding social determinism. The papers in this Special Issue explore diverse fields of healthcare (e.g. reproductive health, primary care, diabetes management, mental health) within which heterogenous technologies (e.g. health apps, mobile platforms, smart textiles, time-lapse imaging) are becoming increasingly embedded. By synthesising the main arguments and contributions in each paper, we elaborate on four key dimensions within which digital technologies create ambivalence and (re)configure health practices. First, promissory digital health highlights contradictory virtues within discourses that configure digital health. Second, (re)configuring knowledge outlines ambivalences of navigating new information environments and handling quantified data. Third, (re)configuring connectivity explores the relationships that evolve through digital networks. Fourth, (re)configuring control explores how new forms of power are inscribed and handled within algorithmic decision-making in health. We argue that these dimensions offer fruitful perspectives along which digital health can be explored across a range of technologies and health practices. We conclude by highlighting applications, methods and dimensions of digital health that require further research.

Keywords: Digital health; care; digital sociology; e-health; science and technology studies (STS); socio-materiality; sociotechnical practices; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abbott, A. (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Armstrong, D. (1995) The rise of surveillance medicine, Sociology of Health & Illness, 17, 3, 393-404.
    1. Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    1. Baum, F. and Fisher, M. (2014) Why behavioural health promotion endures despite its failure to reduce health inequities, Sociology of Health & Illness, 36, 2, 213-25.
    1. Berg, M. (1992) The construction of medical disposals Medical sociology and medical problem solving in clinical practice, Sociology of Health & Illness, 14, 2, 151-80.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources