Primary versus Tertiary Care Follow-Up of Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Real-World Comparison of Outcomes and Costs for Patients and Health Care Systems
- PMID: 31602364
- PMCID: PMC6738170
- DOI: 10.1159/000494835
Primary versus Tertiary Care Follow-Up of Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Real-World Comparison of Outcomes and Costs for Patients and Health Care Systems
Abstract
Background: An unprecedented rise in the prevalence of low-risk well-differentiated thyroid cancer (TC) has been reported in several countries, which is partly due to an increased utility of sensitive imaging techniques. The outcome of these cancers has generally remained excellent and the overall 5-year survival is almost 100%. However, the extended follow-up strategy for these patients remains unclear and while the initial management is done in specialist centres some experts opt to follow them on a long-term basis while others discharge them to primary care after the initial management. The effectiveness of one strategy versus the other has not been studied.
Methods: We conducted a real-world comparison to assess the outcome of low-risk TC (AJCC stage I) with undetectable thyroglobulin (TG) 2 years after radio-iodine (I-131) therapy. The outcome from Halifax (NS, Canada) and London (ON, Canada), where all TC patients are routinely followed by the tertiary care team, was compared with that from Edmonton (AB, Canada), where patients are routinely discharged to primary care.
Results: All patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2011. The mean follow-up in primary care after discharge was 62.2 months and in tertiary care it was 64.6 months (p = 0.43). Rates of recurrence were similar in both groups, i.e., 1.1% in primary care and 1.3% in tertiary care (p = 0.69). Ultrasound surveillance was conducted in 56.5% of the patients in primary care and 52.6% of the tertiary care group (p = 0.26). The rate of annual unstimulated TG testing per patient was 0.58 (range 0-14) in primary care and 0.96 (range 0-6) in tertiary care (p = 0.06). More patients in primary care (86%) than in tertiary care (29.9%) consistently had thyroid-stimulating hormone levels within the target range (p < 0.001). The mean healthcare cost, based on a single follow-up visit with a blood test and ultrasound in the primary care group was CAD 118.01 and in the tertiary care group it was CAD 164.12.
Conclusion: Our study shows that extended follow-up of low-risk TC patients is perfectly feasible in primary care and provides significant economic benefit for the healthcare system.
Keywords: Cost; Follow-up; Outcomes; Primary care; Tertiary care; Thyroid cancer.
Copyright © 2018 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009. PMID: 23074521 Free PMC article.
-
Serial post-surgical stimulated and unstimulated highly sensitive thyroglobulin measurements in low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma patients not receiving radioactive iodine.Endocrine. 2016 Nov;54(2):460-466. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-0989-3. Epub 2016 May 17. Endocrine. 2016. PMID: 27189148
-
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200. Health Technol Assess. 2014. PMID: 24690402 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical options for thyroid cancer and post-surgical management.Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2018 May;13(3):137-148. doi: 10.1080/17446651.2018.1464910. Epub 2018 Apr 20. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2018. PMID: 30058897 Review.
-
Using recombinant human TSH in the management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer: current strategies and future directions.Thyroid. 2000 Sep;10(9):767-78. doi: 10.1089/thy.2000.10.767. Thyroid. 2000. PMID: 11041454 Review.
Cited by
-
Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: How Much Uncertainty Is in the Results?Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 7;30(4):4078-4093. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040310. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37185423 Free PMC article.
-
Hemithyroidectomy for Thyroid Cancer: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Nov 3;56(11):586. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110586. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020. PMID: 33153139 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Economic Evaluation of Long-Term Survivorship Care for Cancer Patients in OECD Countries: A Systematic Review for Decision-Makers.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 3;18(21):11558. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111558. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34770070 Free PMC article.
-
A Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Transient and Permanent Hypocalcemia After Total Thyroidectomy.Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 24;10:614089. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.614089. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33718114 Free PMC article.
-
Follow-up and transition of care for low recurrence risk thyroid cancer patients in Canada.Eur Thyroid J. 2025 Jun 5;14(3):e250072. doi: 10.1530/ETJ-25-0072. Print 2025 Jun 1. Eur Thyroid J. 2025. PMID: 40378304 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegal R, Ward SE, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106–130. - PubMed
-
- Haselkorn T, Bernstein L, Preston-Martin S, Cozen W, Mack WJ. Descriptive epidemiology of thyroid cancer in Los Angeles county, 1972–1995. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:163–170. - PubMed
-
- Davies L, Welch HG. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973–2002. JAMA. 2006;295:2164–2167. - PubMed
-
- Hodgson NC, Button J, Solorzano CC. Thyroid cancer: Is the incidence still increasing? Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:1093–1097. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous