Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1750-1763.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0. Epub 2019 Oct 8.

How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys

Meghan A Bohren et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Women across the world are mistreated during childbirth. We aimed to develop and implement evidence-informed, validated tools to measure mistreatment during childbirth, and report results from a cross-sectional study in four low-income and middle-income countries.

Methods: We prospectively recruited women aged at least 15 years in twelve health facilities (three per country) in Ghana, Guinea, Myanmar, and Nigeria between Sept 19, 2016, and Jan 18, 2018. Continuous observations of labour and childbirth were done from admission up to 2 h post partum. Surveys were administered by interviewers in the community to women up to 8 weeks post partum. Labour observations were not done in Myanmar. Data were collected on sociodemographics, obstetric history, and experiences of mistreatment.

Findings: 2016 labour observations and 2672 surveys were done. 838 (41·6%) of 2016 observed women and 945 (35·4%) of 2672 surveyed women experienced physical or verbal abuse, or stigma or discrimination. Physical and verbal abuse peaked 30 min before birth until 15 min after birth (observation). Many women did not consent for episiotomy (observation: 190 [75·1%] of 253; survey: 295 [56·1%] of 526) or caesarean section (observation: 35 [13·4%] of 261; survey: 52 [10·8%] of 483), despite receiving these procedures. 133 (5·0%) of 2672 women or their babies were detained in the facility because they were unable to pay the bill (survey). Younger age (15-19 years) and lack of education were the primary determinants of mistreatment (survey). For example, younger women with no education (odds ratio [OR] 3·6, 95% CI 1·6-8·0) and younger women with some education (OR 1·6, 1·1-2·3) were more likely to experience verbal abuse, compared with older women (≥30 years), adjusting for marital status and parity.

Interpretation: More than a third of women experienced mistreatment and were particularly vulnerable around the time of birth. Women who were younger and less educated were most at risk, suggesting inequalities in how women are treated during childbirth. Understanding drivers and structural dimensions of mistreatment, including gender and social inequalities, is essential to ensure that interventions adequately account for the broader context.

Funding: United States Agency for International Development and the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for labour observation (A) and community survey (B)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Temporal analysis of mistreatment during labour observation Physical and verbal abuse events per 1000 women. Based on 1590 (78·9%) of 2016 women who were observed for at least 1 h before and after the time of childbirth. Physical and verbal abuse peaked during the period from 30 min before birth until 15 min after birth.

Comment in

  • Accountability for respectful maternity care.
    Afulani PA, Moyer CA. Afulani PA, et al. Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1692-1693. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32258-5. Epub 2019 Oct 8. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31604661 No abstract available.
  • Mistreatment during childbirth.
    Amorim MM, da Silva Bastos MH, Katz L. Amorim MM, et al. Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):816. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31563-4. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32950086 No abstract available.
  • Mistreatment during childbirth.
    Housseine N, Rijken MJ, Punt MC, Meguid T, Franx A, van der Graaf R, Browne JL. Housseine N, et al. Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):816-817. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31556-7. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32950087 No abstract available.
  • Mistreatment during childbirth.
    Williams CR, Belizán JM. Williams CR, et al. Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):817. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31557-9. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32950089 No abstract available.
  • Mind your language: respectful language within maternity services.
    Vimalesvaran S, Ireland J, Khashu M. Vimalesvaran S, et al. Lancet. 2021 Mar 6;397(10277):859-861. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00031-3. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 33676616 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1196–e1252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2016. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities.https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/improving-matern...
    1. Tunçalp Ö, Were WM, MacLennan C. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122:1045–1049. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014;11:71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types