Application of Augmented Intelligence for Pharmacovigilance Case Seriousness Determination
- PMID: 31605285
- PMCID: PMC6965337
- DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00869-4
Application of Augmented Intelligence for Pharmacovigilance Case Seriousness Determination
Abstract
Introduction: Identification of adverse events and determination of their seriousness ensures timely detection of potential patient safety concerns. Adverse event seriousness is a key factor in defining reporting timelines and is often performed manually by pharmacovigilance experts. The dramatic increase in the volume of safety reports necessitates exploration of scalable solutions that also meet reporting timeline requirements.
Objective: The aim of this study was to develop an augmented intelligence methodology for automatically identifying adverse event seriousness in spontaneous, solicited, and medical literature safety reports. Deep learning models were evaluated for accuracy and/or the F1 score against a ground truth labeled by pharmacovigilance experts.
Methods: Using a stratified random sample of safety reports received by Celgene, we developed three neural networks for addressing identification of adverse event seriousness: (1) a binary adverse-event level seriousness classifier; (2) a classifier for determining seriousness categorization at the adverse-event level; and (3) an annotator for identifying seriousness criteria terms to provide supporting evidence at the document level.
Results: The seriousness classifier achieved an accuracy of 83.0% in post-marketing reports, 92.9% in solicited reports, and 86.3% in medical literature reports. F1 scores for seriousness categorization were 77.7 for death, 78.9 for hospitalization, and 75.5 for important medical events. The seriousness annotator achieved an F1 score of 89.9 in solicited reports, and 75.2 in medical literature reports.
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that a neural network approach can provide an accurate and scalable solution for potentially augmenting pharmacovigilance practitioner determination of adverse event seriousness in spontaneous, solicited, and medical literature reports.
Conflict of interest statement
Ramani Routray, Claire Abu-Assal, Hanqing Chen, Shenghua Bao, Van Willis, Sharon Hensley Alford, and Vivek Krishnamurthy were employed by IBM Watson Health at the time this research was conducted. Niki Tatarenko, Ruta Mockute, Bruno Assuncao, Sameen Desai, Salvatore Cicirello, Karolina Danysz, and Edward Mingle were employed by Celgene Corporation at the time this research was conducted and hold stock/stock options therein.
Figures



References
-
- World Health Organization . The importance of pharmacovigilance: safety monitoring of medicinal products. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
-
- European Medicines Agency . Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices. Annex I: definitions (Rev 4) Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2017.
-
- US Food and Drug Administration. Investigational new drug safety reporting. 21CFR31232. Silver Spring: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2017.
-
- US Food and Drug Administration. Individual case safety reports. 2–18. https://www.fdagov/forindustry/datastandards/individualcasesafetyreports.... Accessed Dec 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical