Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan:82:102965.
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102965. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Reducing delays to diagnosis in ambulatory care settings: A macrocognition perspective

Affiliations

Reducing delays to diagnosis in ambulatory care settings: A macrocognition perspective

Emily S Patterson et al. Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

We aim to use a macrocognition theoretical perspective to characterize contributors to diagnostic delays by physicians that can be mitigated by work system redesign. As experienced with other complex, sociotechnical domains, system redesign is anticipated to be more effective at improving safety than training-based solutions. In the outpatient care setting, complex tasks, conducted by a primary care provider, are provided for five macrocognition functions: sensemaking, re-planning, detecting problems, deciding, and coordinating. Redesigning systems could reduce delays to diagnosis by helping users to avoid missed symptoms, forgotten follow-up activities, and delayed actions. Health information technology could support resilience strategies by offloading documentation burdens, recording working diagnoses, displaying planned follow-up activities at the correct time interval, and supporting recognition of patterns in patient care. These insights suggest a path forward for future research on system design innovations to reduce diagnostic delays, and ultimately, reduce patient harm.

Keywords: Ambulatory care; Delayed diagnosis; Human factors; Medical informatics; Patient harm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests statement: The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Relationship of complex tasks, macrocognition functions, vulnerabilities, and resilience strategies to delays in diagnosis.

References

    1. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Griffiths P, Busse R, … & McHugh MD (2014). Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. The Lancet, 383(9931), 1824–1830. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bunting RF, & Groszkruger DP (2016). From to err is human to improving diagnosis in health care: the risk management perspective. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 35(3), 10–23. - PubMed
    1. Carayon P, Hundt AS, Karsh BT, Gurses AP, Alvarado CJ, Smith M, & Brennan PF (2006). Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. BMJ Quality & Safety, 15(suppl 1), i50–i58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Card SK, Robertson GG, & Mackinlay JD (1991, April). The information visualizer, an information workspace In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 181–186). ACM.
    1. Croskerry P, Singhal G, & Mamede S (2013). Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ Qual Saf, bmjqs-2012. - PMC - PubMed