Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985 Jun;2(2):99-104.
doi: 10.1007/BF01139341.

Various techniques for oocyte recovery in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program

Comparative Study

Various techniques for oocyte recovery in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program

J C Belaisch-Allart et al. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1985 Jun.

Abstract

Oocyte recovery in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) program can be performed by laparoscopy or by sonography. Most IVF teams use either one or the other of these methods. In Clamart, we undertook 407 IVF attempts from September 1983 to March 1984, 225 by laparoscopy under general anesthesia, 97 by laparoscopy under local anesthesia, and 85 by sonography. Excluding the recovery techniques, all aspects of the program (ovulation monitoring, culture, and transfer) were identical in order to study the effects of the anesthesia and the ultrasound. We did not find any significant difference in pregnancy rates, inclusive of biochemical pregnancies, among these three recovery methods, although ultrasonically guided puncture gave fewer follicles, oocytes, and embryos than laparoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Presse Med. 1983 Sep 24;12(33):2053-4 - PubMed
    1. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1981;10(2):127-32 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966 Sep 15;96(2):192-200 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 1983 May;39(5):603-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1985;442:182-94 - PubMed

Publication types